Diet and nutritionIs it genes that make us fat, or what’s on our plate?
- prof. David Ludwig — Do Genes Make Us Fat?
- Ewa Dąbrowska — Dieta warzywno owocowa
- Ewa Dąbrowska — Schorzenia i świadectwa
- Paul Clayton — Dieta a nasze przeznaczenie
- Bracia Rodzeń — Bracia Rodzeń
- Jerzy Jaśkowski — Autyzm – czyli jak nas podstępnie uszkadzają i okradają
- M. Williamson i N. Moustaid-Moussa i L. Gollahon — Frontiers | The Molecular Effects of Dietary Acid Load on Metabolic Disease (The Cellular PasaDoble: The Fast-Paced Dance of pH Regulation)
- Factors Associated with Eating in the Absence of Hunger among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. · Nutrients 2022
- Obesity and eating behavior from the perspective of twin and genetic research. · Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2020
- Genetics of eating and its relation to obesity. · Curr Atheroscler Rep 2002
- Emotional eating and obesity in adults: the role of depression, sleep and genes. · Proc Nutr Soc 2020
- Behavioral and Psychological Factors Affecting Weight Loss Success. · Curr Obes Rep 2023
- Understanding eating in the absence of hunger among young children: a systematic review of existing studies. · Appetite 2015
- Transgenerational transmission of eating habits. · J Pediatr (Rio J) 2024
- Dopamine D2 receptors in addiction-like reward dysfunction and compulsive eating in obese rats. · Nat Neurosci 2010
Genes affect our susceptibility to weight gain, but they do not explain the rise in obesity on their own; food and the environment matter too.
- Some rare genetic changes can cause severe obesity, but many genes affect weight only slightly.
- Ewa Dąbrowska identifies an unhealthy lifestyle, especially processed food and lack of exercise, as the main cause of obesity.
- Diet and physical activity can also change how genes work without changing their structure.
- In short: genes can increase susceptibility, while eating habits and other conditions can affect whether weight increases.
What the authors write
Many genes affect weight, usually only slightly, while rare mutations can cause severe obesity.
The obesity epidemic has grown too quickly to be explained by genetic changes; the author points to changes in the environment and processed food.
Diet and physical activity can switch genes on or off without changing their structure.
An unhealthy lifestyle, especially too much processed food and too little exercise, is identified as the main cause of obesity.
An unhealthy lifestyle, including too much processed food and too little physical activity, is identified as the main cause of obesity.
A diet high in processed carbohydrates can raise insulin levels, and excess insulin may promote fat storage.
Eating habits and living conditions, such as poverty, access to fresh food, and heat that limits physical activity, are identified as factors associated with obesity.
Eating habits, marketing, and social norms can make it harder to return to a healthy diet.
More frequent adoption of a Southern diet and lifestyle, rather than Southern genes, was identified as an explanation for differences in residents’ health.
According to Bracia Rodzeń, carbohydrates raise insulin levels, and insulin signals the body to store energy; consuming more carbohydrates is said to promote weight gain.
The statement quoted attributes the rise in obesity to environmental changes, which may trigger disease in people with a genetic predisposition.
The effect of saturated fats on obesity risk may depend on the APOA2 gene variant.
Research from PubMed · Europe PMC
We selected 8 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.
Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 4 114.
A review found that, in children, eating when not hungry is associated with more body fat, and its development may be partly influenced by genetics.
Aim of the study: Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) has been extensively studied over the past two decades and has been associated with excess body weight and the development of obesity. However, determinants of EAH remain uncertain.
Results: Moreover, EAH development seems to be influenced by genetics. In adolescence, the number of studies is limited; yet, studies show that EAH slightly increases or remains stable with age, is not clearly different between sexes, and findings for overweight or obesity are less consistent across studies in adolescence. For familial factors, parental restrictive feeding practices are positively associated with EAH during childhood, mostly for girls. Studies assessing environmental factors are lacking and robust longitudinal studies spanning from early childhood to adolescence are needed.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review indicates that genes affect BMI and eating behaviors, but the environment and eating habits matter too.
Aim of the study: Obesity has dramatically increased during the last decades and is currently one of the most serious global health problems. We present a hypothesis that obesity is a neuro-behavioral disease having a strong genetic background mediated largely by eating behavior and is sensitive to the macro-environment; we study this hypothesis from the perspective of genetic research.
Results: Obesogenic environments at both childhood family and societal levels reinforce the genetic susceptibility to obesity. Genetic factors have a clear influence on macro-nutrient intake and appetite-related eating behavior traits. Results on the gene-by-diet interactions in obesity are mixed, but emerging evidence suggests that eating behavior traits partly mediate the effect of genes on BMI. However, more rigorous prospective study designs controlling for measurement bias are still needed.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review indicates that genes have a moderate influence on eating habits, while the environment matters as well.
Aim of the study: Humans show remarkable variability in their eating styles. Reasons for this variability are poorly understood, but carry important implications for the onset of obesity and its comorbidities.
Results: This review highlights what is known about the genetics of food preferences and selection in humans. Data from family and twin studies suggest a moderate genetic contribution to eating style, with clear environmental effects emerging as well. Select studies show support for gene-environment interactions and common genetic bases for certain dietary patterns, obesity, and/or metabolic complications. Genetically informative designs that infuse innovative behavioral measures may help explain individual differences in eating styles and hopefully promote more effective obesity treatments.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review describes how emotional eating may contribute to later weight gain, and how genes may partly affect weight through eating behaviors.
Aim of the study: Stress and other negative emotions, such as depression and anxiety, can lead to both decreased and increased food intake. The term 'emotional eating' has been widely used to refer to the latter response: a tendency to eat in response to negative emotions with the chosen foods being primarily energy-dense and palatable ones.
Results: First, studies implying that emotional eating may be one behavioural mechanism linking depression and development of obesity. Secondly, studies highlighting the relevance of night sleep duration by showing that adults with a combination of shorter sleep and higher emotional eating may be especially vulnerable to weight gain. Thirdly, an emerging literature suggesting that genes may influence body weight partly through emotional eating and other eating behaviour dimensions. The review concludes by discussing what kind of implications these three avenues of research offer for obesity prevention and treatment interventions.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review indicates that successful weight loss depends not only on biology, but also on behaviors and psychological factors.
Aim of the study: There is a large variability between individuals in the weight loss response to any given diet treatment, which fuels interest into personalized or precision nutrition. Although most efforts are directed toward identifying biological or metabolic factors, several behavioral and psychological factors can also be responsible for some of this interindividual variability.
Results: There are many factors that can influence the response to dietary weight loss interventions, including factors related to eating behavior (emotional eating, disinhibition, restraint, perceived stress), behaviors and societal norms related to age and sex, psychological and personal factors (motivation, self-efficacy, locus of control, self-concept), and major life events. The success of a weight loss intervention can be influenced by many psychological and behavioral constructs and not merely by physiological factors such as biology and genetics. These factors are difficult to capture accurately and are often overlooked. Future weight loss studies should consider assessing such factors to better understand the underlying reasons for the large interindividual variability to weight loss therapy.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review found that children with overweight or obesity are more likely to eat after becoming full, and some studies point to a genetic basis for this behavior.
Aim of the study: Eating in the Absence of Hunger (EAH), or consuming highly palatable foods when satiated, is one behavioral pathway that may lead to childhood obesity. EAH is an objective, laboratory-based measure. A more comprehensive understanding of potential determinants of EAH could inform childhood obesity programs outside of a laboratory setting.
Results: 12 cross-sectional, six prospective, and one behavioral-intervention studies were included in the review. EAH was observable among boys and girls; absolute levels of EAH increased with age; and maternal feeding styles were associated with EAH among girls. The most consistent evidence supported increased levels of EAH among overweight and obese versus normal weight children, both cross-sectionally and prospectively. Two studies supported a genetic component to EAH. Studies enrolling independent samples support a positive association between weight status and EAH among children; studies addressing causality are needed. Other various individual, genetic, and familiar characteristics were associated with EAH, yet studies among more heterogeneous sample populations are needed to confirm findings. Studies addressing societal-level factors related to EAH were absent.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
A review indicates that children’s eating habits are shaped by their family and social environment, and that genetics may also matter in obesity.
Aim of the study: To investigate the relationship between the biopsychosocial environment and eating habits and behaviors that lead to the selection and consumption of certain food from the earliest stages of life. To clarify whether there is an interaction between genetic and epigenetic factors, and how they shape eating habits.
Results: Eating habits are transmitted from parents to children in different ways: environmental, emotional, social, and educational. In cases of obesity, a greater association of genetic influence can be observed.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
In a rat study, excessive consumption of high-calorie, tasty food was associated with the development of obesity and compulsive eating.
Aim of the study: We found that development of obesity was coupled with emergence of a progressively worsening deficit in neural reward responses. Similar changes in reward homeostasis induced by cocaine or heroin are considered to be crucial in triggering the transition from casual to compulsive drug-taking.
Results: Striatal dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) were downregulated in obese rats, as has been reported in humans addicted to drugs. Moreover, lentivirus-mediated knockdown of striatal D2Rs rapidly accelerated the development of addiction-like reward deficits and the onset of compulsive-like food seeking in rats with extended access to palatable high-fat food. These data demonstrate that overconsumption of palatable food triggers addiction-like neuroadaptive responses in brain reward circuits and drives the development of compulsive eating. Common hedonic mechanisms may therefore underlie obesity and drug addiction.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.