PisaczekSearch
文AEN
Diet and nutrition

Tuna for dinner — are we eating mercury along with the fish?

Sources: 13 · Article: 13 798 characters

Hubert Czerniak points out that large fish, such as tuna, contain a lot of mercury.

  • Piotr Witczak identifies mercury from fish as methylmercury.

What the authors write

Hubert Czerniak

Large fish, such as tuna, contain a lot of mercury.

„Sorghum, tapioca, cocoa, amaranth, chicken, poultry (but organic), and fish are also recommended for children, but not large fish like tuna, because they contain a lot of mercury. Fatty fish are best—zander, trout, roach, and bream. Fresh and dried fruit and juices are also recommended, although not all fruits are suitable.”Dla dzieci zalecane jest też sorgo, tapioka, kakao, amarantus, kurczak, ptactwo (ale ekologiczne) i ryby, ale nie te wielkie jak tuńczyk, bo tam jest dużo rtęci, najlepiej tłuste – sandacz, pstrąg, płoć, leszcz. Ponadto owoce świeże oraz suszone i soki, ale też nie wszystkie owoce są wskazane.
Andrzej Frydrychowski

Metals build up in fish flesh, especially in long-lived fish such as tuna.

„As the final consumers of plants and animals, our bodies are particularly sensitive to elevated levels of heavy metals, especially cadmium and lead, and are exposed to their continuous buildup. We should pay attention to the growing pollution of seas and oceans. This leads to metals building up in the flesh of fish, which we readily eat. This applies especially to long-lived fish, such as tuna and hake.”Nasz organizm natomiast jako ostateczny konsument roślin i zwierząt, będący szczególnie wrażliwy na obecność podwyższonych ilości metali ciężkich, zwłaszcza kadmu i ołowiu, jest narażony na ciągłą ich kumulację. Należy zwrócić uwagę na narastające zanieczyszczenie mórz i oceanów. Efektem tego jest kumulacja metali w mięsie ryb, które tak chętnie spożywamy. Dotyczy to szczególnie ryb długo źyjących np. tuńczyka, merlina.
Piotr Witczak

Fish and seafood are sources of mercury, especially large predatory fish.

„Examples of significant sources of mercury include amalgam fillings, some vaccines, broken mercury thermometers and CFL bulbs, as well as prenatal exposure (the transfer of heavy metals from the mother's body to the fetus). Less significant sources include fish and seafood (especially large predatory fish), tattoos, and many others.”Przykładowe, istotne źródła rtęci to wypełnienia amalgamatowe, niektóre szczepionki, rozbite termometry rtęciowe i żarówki typu CFL, a także ekspozycja prenatalna (transfer metali ciężkich z organizmu matki do płodu) oraz mniej znaczące źródła, takie jak ryby i owoce morza (w szczególności duże ryby drapieżne), tatuaże i wiele innych.
Piotr Witczak

Mercury from fish is identified as methylmercury.

„Most of us are poisoned by mercury through eating fish (methylmercury), vaccines (ethylmercury), amalgam fillings, broken light bulbs, thermometers, tattoos, and other, less significant sources. We receive some of this toxin at the very beginning of our lives through mercury passing across the placenta from the mother's body to the fetus, and later through breast milk.”Większość z nas zatruwa się rtęcią poprzez spożywanie ryb (metylortęć), szczepienia (etylortęć), amalgamaty, rozbite żarówki, termometry, tatuaże i inne, mniej istotne źródła. Pewną pulę tej toksyny otrzymujemy już na samym początku naszego życia poprzez transfer rtęci przez łożysko z organizmu matki do płodu, a później jeszcze z mlekiem matki.
Jerzy Zięba

Fish can contain various toxins, including heavy metals.

„By now, as many people already know, eating fish is just as risky, precisely because fish contain various toxins (fish are often cancerous). These cancers most often occur around the fish's head.”W tej chwili, jak wielu osobom już wiadomo, spożywanie ryb jest równie ryzykowne, właśnie ze względu na to, że zawierają różnego rodzaju toksyny (wielokrotnie ryby mają chorobę nowotworową). Nowotwory te najczęściej umieszczają się w okolicach głowy ryby.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 8 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 174.

A meta-analysis found that the average mercury content of the canned tuna tested was below the recommended limits.

Aim of the study: Human consumption of fish protein, including canned tuna fish, is increasing steadily worldwide. However, there are some concerns about the potential exposure to elevated concentrations of metals in canned tuna fish.

Results: For children, they were 7.23E-05 for Al and 2.91E-08 for Cr. THQ and total target hazard quotient (TTHQ) were ≤1.0 for adult and child consumers. The Incremental Lifetime Cancer Risk (ILCR) for As was 3.21E-5 in adults and 4.18E-5 in children. Adults and children who consume canned tuna fish in Iran are not at non-carcinogenic risk but face a carcinogenic risk due to As.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the tuna products tested, mercury intake was below the reference value, and the estimated risk to consumers was below 1%.

Aim of the study: To balance the risks and benefits of fish consumption, selenium, fatty acids (DHA + EPA), and mercury in fishery products were determined. Analyzed products were canned tuna, frozen tuna (Thunnus albacares), smoked striped marlin (Tetrapturus audax), fresh Pacific sierra (Scomberomorus sierra), fresh dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus), fresh tilapia (Gerres cinereus), and fresh bullseye puffer (Sphoeroides annulatus).

Results: EPA + DHA ranged from 1.16 to 10.72 mg g-1. EPA + DHA intake was comparable to or above the recommended daily intake; Hg intake was below the reference dose, but Se intake was below the recommended values for the different population groups. Based on HBVSe, fishery products had positive values; that is, they are healthy foods. Considering the interaction between Hg and Se and the rate of fishery product consumption, the risk to consumers is below one percent.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Secretaría de Educación Pública
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyanimal study

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The study found that the amount of bioaccessible mercury in the fish consumed was far below the current safety limits.

Aim of the study: The bioaccessible Hg fraction in fish and seafood commonly present in the Mediterranean diet was assessed through three distinct in vitro extraction schemes. Each extraction method provided different results, highlighting the lack of a universal methodology to estimate mercury (Hg) bioaccessibility in those matrices.

Results: Among the three extraction methods tested, the Unified Bioaccessibility Method (UBM) provided the highest estimate of Hg bioaccessibility for consumers. The cooking methods tested (frying, grilling, and steaming) considerably reduced the bioaccessible fraction. Results indicate that bioaccessible Hg in consumed fish and seafood is far below the levels set by current safety risk assessment legislation. These findings highlight the importance of including bioaccessibility measurements in food safety legislation.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyanimal study

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the canned fish tested, mercury concentrations were well below the permissible levels, and moderate consumption was unlikely to be a significant source of exposure.

Aim of the study: Total mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) concentrations were determined in canned fish on the Ghanaian market. Total mercury was determined using an automatic mercury analyzer while cadmium and lead levels were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry.

Results: Total mercury was determined using an automatic mercury analyzer while cadmium and lead levels were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The metal contents in the samples, expressed in μg g(-1) (wet weight), varied from <0.01 to 0.20 with an average value of 0.03 for mercury, from <0.01 to 0.45 with an average value of 0.34 for cadmium, and from <0.01 to 1.44 with an average value of 0.72 for lead. The results indicate that canned fish from the Ghanaian market have concentrations well below the permissible FAO/WHO limits for these toxic metals. Thus, considering the Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intake (PTWI) of Hg, Pb and Cd, the levels obtained in this study are unlikely to constitute significant public exposure through consumption of moderate amounts.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the analysis of canned tuna from Iran, the average histamine level and associated risk for adults were low.

Aim of the study: Histamine is one of the most important health issues associated with consumption of canned tuna because of possible allergic and anaphylactic reactions in consumers. Although the concentrations of histamine in tuna in Iran have been investigated in several studies, definitive conclusions are elusive.

Results: The mean prevalence of histamine was 9.19% (95%; CI, 6.88 to 11.5%). The 95% value of the target hazard quotient for adult consumers was calculated as 0.10. In all studies performed in Iran, the concentration of histamine in canned tuna was lower than the FDA standard. Health risk assessment indicated low histamine risk (target hazard quotient < 1) for adults in Iran from consumption of canned tuna.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the tuna tested, mercury levels were within international limits, although the estimated risk for one brand exceeded the reference threshold.

Aim of the study: Mercury (Hg) is a toxic element that bioaccumulates in aquatic organisms, posing health risks through seafood consumption. This study quantified total Hg in canned tuna in oil purchased from supermarkets in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador.

Results: Mean Hg concentrations were 0.22 ± 0.10 mg/kg, 0.63 ± 0.10 mg/kg, and 0.36 ± 0.15 mg/kg for brands A, B, and C, respectively. All values complied with international safety limits; however, the non-carcinogenic risk (HQ > 1) associated with methylmercury exposure from brand C exceeded the reference threshold established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Recommended weekly intake of tuna to avoid health risks was estimated at 106 g (children) and 512 g (adults) for A; 26 g and 126 g for B; and 64 g and 307 g for C, respectively.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Risk indicators were low in most of the fish tested from the Polish market, but methylmercury levels in tuna exceeded the recommended safe value.

Aim of the study: Despite health benefits, fish consumption poses risks of exposure to toxic substances. Concentrations of toxic metals were determined in 20 fish species available on the Polish market.

Results: Only in tuna was the THQ marker for MeHg twice the recommended safe value. The high methylmercury content and high THQ in tuna indicate that consumption of this fish should be limited. Over the past decade, levels of toxic metals in fish on the Polish market have remained stable. The only significant change was the increase in THg and MeHg in tuna.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Mercury was detected in the tuna tested, and some samples exceeded the Turkish limit.

Aim of the study: This study evaluated the concentrations of minerals and heavy metals in canned tuna products available on the Turkish market, with a particular focus on the influence of packaging medium (water, oil, and sauce) on elemental distribution. A total of 105 canned tuna samples were collected from Van Province, Türkiye, comprising equal groups (n = 35) of water-, oil-, and sauce-packed products.

Results: Arsenic concentrations ranged from 0.31 to 7.08 mg/kg (overall mean: 1.49 mg/kg) and were frequently detected across all packaging types (74–100% of samples). All samples complied with regulatory limits for lead and tin. Health risk assessment based on estimated daily intake and target hazard quotient indicated a potential non-carcinogenic risk associated with arsenic exposure, while mercury exposure approached the risk threshold, particularly for oil-packed tuna. The ICP-MS method, assessed through certified reference material and quality control procedures, demonstrated adequate sensitivity and reliability for elemental analysis of canned tuna products and supports food safety assessment in the Turkish seafood market.

Money for the studycompany together with others · Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK), Research Fund of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyanimal study
Participants105

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.