„我们表明,这项研究显然预示了血栓形成及其他不良反应的严重风险。在随后的临床试验中未能监测和评估这些风险,加上紧急使用授权审批过程中的严重疏忽,可以预见地导致了一场前所未有的医疗灾难。”We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.
„由于官方认可的仓促做法以及COVID-19疫苗开发和审批过程中的系统性严重疏忽,我们对其药代动力学的了解很有限。迄今公开发表的唯一一项较为详细的动物研究涉及辉瑞疫苗[1, 2]。”Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].
„他们分析了8项研究、7种COVID-19疫苗和超过150,000名受试者,发现与未接种疫苗的对照组相比,mRNA疫苗的不良事件风险最高:接种第一剂和第二剂后,发生不良事件的风险分别增加至1.83倍(95% CI 1.80-1.86)和2.16倍(95% CI 2.11-2.20)。”In their analysis of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines, and over 150,000 subjects, they found that the mRNA vaccines showed the highest risk of adverse events compared to unvaccinated controls, with 1.83 times (95% CI 1.80-1.86) and 2.16 times (95% CI 2.11-2.20) increased risk of an adverse event after the first and second dose, respectively.
„报告最多的全身性反应类型是发热、疲劳和头痛。Fraiman等人评估了辉瑞BNT162b2和Moderna mRNA-1273疫苗III期临床试验数据中的严重不良事件(SAE)和特别关注的不良事件(AESI)[277]。”The most common types of systemic reactions reported were fever, fatigue and headache. Fraiman et al. assessed serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) in phase III clinical trial data for the Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines [277].
„孕妇和哺乳期母亲被排除在简化且草率的临床试验之外,但在疫苗获得紧急使用授权(EUA)后,仍被鼓励立即接种。这意味着她们的生育能力和婴儿健康面临不可接受的风险(见第7.7节)。”Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers, who had been excluded from the abridged and perfunctory clinical trials, were nevertheless encouraged to receive the vaccines immediately after the EUAs had been given, which implies unacceptable risks for their fertility and for the health of infants (see Section 7.7).
„然而,不仅根本没有合理依据可以考虑批准此类紧急使用授权,相关授权的颁发还基于生产商提供的不完整且明显具有欺诈性的文件。本文第2.9节列举了一些此类欺诈的证据;监管机构本应发现这些问题,但显然没有发现。”But not only was there no valid rationale for even contemplating such EUAs—the issuance was based on incomplete and patently fraudulent documentation provided by the manufacturers. Some evidence of such fraud, which should have been caught by the regulators but apparently wasn’t, is presented here in Section 2.9.
„英国暂停为易发生严重过敏反应的人接种疫苗,https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html
英国:过敏者不接种疫苗,https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192
过敏者不应接种辉瑞和BioNTech公司的疫苗,https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551
英国药品和医疗保健产品监管局”Wielka Brytania wstrzymuje sczepienia osób ze skłonnością do silnych reakcji alergicznych, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html
Wielka Brytania: szczepienia nie dla alergików, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192
Osoby z alergiami nie powinny przyjmować szczepionki firmy Pfizer i BioNTech, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551
Brytyjska agencja ds.
研究经费政府、公共机构 · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China
研究经费政府、公共机构 · Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
作者与公司有关联吗?没有——作者如此声明
生产商是否参与协助研究?否
研究类型对其他研究的讨论
“未注明”并不代表无人出资——数据库并不总会记录。
观点与评论材料
以下内容为作者的观点、解读和假设,不与科学研究和系统评价同等看待。
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service 观点材料
„Vera Hassner Sharav写道:“大西洋两岸的公共卫生官员已经失去了公众的信任,因为他们与疫苗生产商沆瀣一气,否认存在安全问题。如果疫苗不存在安全问题,美国疫苗法院为何已为2,500起涉及儿童因疫苗相关伤害而致残的案件裁决赔付超过20亿美元?”(8)美国FDA官员分析自闭症与含硫柳汞疫苗的数据时,发现了明确的关联。他们在2000年7月于弗吉尼亚州辛普森伍德举行的一次会议记录中详细描述了自己的回应:对数据进行“修饰”,让这种关联消失(9)。”Vera Hassner Sharav writes: "Public health officials on both sides of the Atlantic have lost the public trust because they have been in league with vaccine manufacturers in denying that safety problems exist. If vaccines posed no safety problems why has the US Vaccine Court awarded more than $2 billion dollars to settle 2,500 cases involving vaccine-related debilitating injuries in children?" (8) When US FDA officials analyzed the data on autism and thimerosal-containing vaccines they found a clear link. Their response, detailed in transcripts of a meeting at Simpsonwood, VA in July 2000 was to "massage" the data to make the link go away (9).
„平衡疫苗接种的益处与风险,对于确保接种计划的安全性和有效性至关重要。”Balancing both the benefits and risks is essential for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of vaccination programs.
„VAERS(疫苗不良事件报告系统)是美国的一项疫苗安全监测计划,由美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和食品药品监督管理局(FDA)设立。过去三年中,接种mRNA产品后发生不良反应(包括死亡)的记录数量,远高于自1990年以来(34年前)所有疫苗不良反应记录的总数。对mRNA接种开始后第一年的VAERS数据进行审查发现:与此前30年所有其他疫苗合计相比,一年COVID-19疫苗接种所报告的不良事件和致残事件数量相当。”VAERS The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is a US program to monitor vaccine safety, created by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). . The records of adverse effects including deaths following immunization with mRNA products in three years is much greater than the total number of adverse effects recorded for all vaccines since 1990 (34 years ago). Examining VAERS data during the first year of mRNA inoculations finds that one year of COVID inoculations compared to 30 years of all other vaccines combined the number of adverse events and disabling events are comparable.