Download the appMore options
PisaczekSearch
文AEN-US
Vaccines

MRNA vaccines — what concerns do doctors and scientists raise?

Sources: 14 · Article: 20 162 characters

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi warns that an animal study of the Pfizer vaccine was said to indicate a serious risk of blood clots and other adverse effects.

  • According to him, knowledge of where vaccines go in the body and how long they remain there is limited, and the cited analysis found a higher risk of adverse effects after mRNA vaccines.
  • In the analyses, the most common adverse effects included fever, fatigue and headache; Bhakdi also links vaccination during pregnancy and breastfeeding to risks to fertility and infant health.
  • Jerzy Zięba points to a warning that people with allergies should not receive the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine.

What the authors write

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

An animal study of the Pfizer vaccine was said to indicate a serious risk of blood clots and other adverse effects.

„We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.”We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

According to Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, knowledge of where COVID-19 vaccines go in the body and how long they remain there is limited because of the haste with which they were developed and approved.

„Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].”Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

The cited analysis of over 150,000 people found a higher risk of adverse effects after mRNA vaccines than among unvaccinated people.

„In their analysis of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines, and over 150,000 subjects, they found that the mRNA vaccines showed the highest risk of adverse events compared to unvaccinated controls, with 1.83 times (95% CI 1.80-1.86) and 2.16 times (95% CI 2.11-2.20) increased risk of an adverse event after the first and second dose, respectively.”In their analysis of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines, and over 150,000 subjects, they found that the mRNA vaccines showed the highest risk of adverse events compared to unvaccinated controls, with 1.83 times (95% CI 1.80-1.86) and 2.16 times (95% CI 2.11-2.20) increased risk of an adverse event after the first and second dose, respectively.
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

In the analyses cited by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, the most common general adverse effects included fever, fatigue and headache.

„The most common types of systemic reactions reported were fever, fatigue and headache. Fraiman et al. assessed serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) in phase III clinical trial data for the Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines [277].”The most common types of systemic reactions reported were fever, fatigue and headache. Fraiman et al. assessed serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) in phase III clinical trial data for the Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines [277].
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

Pregnant and breastfeeding women were excluded from the short clinical trials, yet were encouraged to get vaccinated, which Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi links to risks to fertility and infant health.

„Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers, who had been excluded from the abridged and perfunctory clinical trials, were nevertheless encouraged to receive the vaccines immediately after the EUAs had been given, which implies unacceptable risks for their fertility and for the health of infants (see Section 7.7).”Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers, who had been excluded from the abridged and perfunctory clinical trials, were nevertheless encouraged to receive the vaccines immediately after the EUAs had been given, which implies unacceptable risks for their fertility and for the health of infants (see Section 7.7).
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi questions the justification for emergency authorization of COVID-19 vaccines and accuses manufacturers of submitting incomplete and, in his view, fraudulent documentation.

„But not only was there no valid rationale for even contemplating such EUAs—the issuance was based on incomplete and patently fraudulent documentation provided by the manufacturers. Some evidence of such fraud, which should have been caught by the regulators but apparently wasn’t, is presented here in Section 2.9.”But not only was there no valid rationale for even contemplating such EUAs—the issuance was based on incomplete and patently fraudulent documentation provided by the manufacturers. Some evidence of such fraud, which should have been caught by the regulators but apparently wasn’t, is presented here in Section 2.9.
Jerzy Zięba

Jerzy Zięba points to a warning that people with allergies should not receive the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine.

„United Kingdom suspends vaccination of people prone to severe allergic reactions, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html United Kingdom: no vaccinations for people with allergies, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192 People with allergies should not receive the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551 British agency for...”Wielka Brytania wstrzymuje sczepienia osób ze skłonnością do silnych reakcji alergicznych, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html Wielka Brytania: szczepienia nie dla alergików, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192 Osoby z alergiami nie powinny przyjmować szczepionki firmy Pfizer i BioNTech, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551 Brytyjska agencja ds.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 8 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 3 249.

The review indicates that excessive immune stimulation by the vaccine may weaken its effectiveness and cause adverse effects.

Aim of the study: Adjuvanticity and delivery are crucial facets of mRNA vaccine design. In modern mRNA vaccines, adjuvant functions are integrated into mRNA vaccine nanoparticles, allowing the co-delivery of antigen mRNA and adjuvants in a unified, all-in-one formulation.

Results: However, careful design is necessary, as excessive adjuvanticity and activation of improper innate immune signalling can conversely hinder vaccination efficacy and trigger adverse effects. mRNA vaccines also require delivery systems to achieve antigen expression in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) within lymphoid organs. Some vaccines directly target APCs in the lymphoid organs, while others rely on APCs migration to the draining lymph nodes after taking up mRNA vaccines. This review explores the current mechanistic understanding of these processes and the ongoing efforts to improve vaccine safety and efficacy based on this understanding.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Leading Advanced Projects for Medical Innovation, Research on Development of New Drugs
Do the authors have ties to companies?yes — the authors reported it
Did a manufacturer help with the study?YES
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The authors note that traditional lipid nanoparticles can accumulate in the liver, which may pose a risk of liver damage.

Aim of the study: The advent of mRNA vaccines represents a breakthrough in the realm of cancer therapy and the prevention of infectious disease. Nevertheless, traditional lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-based mRNA vaccines can accumulate in the liver post-intramuscular injection, posing a risk of hepatotoxicity and reducing efficacy.

Results: We construct a library of ionizable lipids with albumin-binding capacity as alternatives to traditional polyethylene-glycol-conjugated lipid. We identify an Evans blue-modified lipid-based LNP (EB-LNP) formulation that shows high in vivo expression, albumin-facilitated transport through intramuscular lymphatic vessels to the lymph nodes, high internalization by dendritic cells and low penetration into intramuscular blood vessels, thereby avoiding liver accumulation. EB-LNP-based mRNA vaccines demonstrate excellent antitumour and antiviral efficacy, resulting in strong cellular and humoral immune responses, including the robust activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes and production of neutralizing antibodies post-vaccination. Overall, this system shows promise as an effective and minimally toxic platform for the development of mRNA vaccines with high efficacy and safety.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · National University of Singapore
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review recorded common vaccine reactions and rare, life-threatening adverse events in adolescents.

Aim of the study: The COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected adolescents. Safe and effective vaccines are pivotal tools in controlling this pandemic.

Results: AESIs were rarely reported but were more frequent after the second dose than they were after the first and the booster doses. Health impact was less common among adolescents after receiving BNT162b2 vaccine. Rare life-threatening AEFIs were reported across all doses in real-world studies. Our findings highlight the significance of enhancing national and regional vaccination programs to ensure public confidence.

Money for the studynot stated · funding associated with the work featured in this article
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The authors note that gaps in knowledge remain about how mRNA vaccines work and how to improve their safety.

Aim of the study: The concept of mRNA-based vaccines emerged more than three decades ago. Groundbreaking discoveries and technological advancements over the past 20 years have resolved the major roadblocks that initially delayed application of this new vaccine modality.

Results: The rapid development of nucleoside-modified COVID-19 mRNA vaccines demonstrated that this immunization platform is easy to develop, has an acceptable safety profile and can be produced at a large scale. The flexibility and ease of antigen design have enabled mRNA vaccines to enter development for a wide range of viruses as well as for various bacteria and parasites. However, gaps in our knowledge limit the development of next-generation mRNA vaccines with increased potency and safety. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms of action of mRNA vaccines, application of novel technologies enabling rational antigen design, and innovative vaccine delivery strategies and vaccination regimens will likely yield potent novel vaccines against a wide range of pathogens.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NCI NIH HHS, NIAID NIH HHS, NIGMS NIH HHS
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review lists challenges related, among other things, to vaccine delivery, stability and safety.

Aim of the study: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the transformative potential of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in biomedicine, thanks to their rapid design, scalable production, and strong immunogenicity. Nonetheless, their widespread adoption remains hindered by challenges related to sequence optimization, delivery efficiency, thermostability, and safety.

Results: Particular attention is given to the intrinsic adjuvant properties of mRNA molecules and their delivery vehicles, as well as strategies for incorporating exogenous adjuvants to modulate immune responses. Furthermore, the article provides a succinct overview of key preclinical and clinical advancements in mRNA vaccines targeting major infectious diseases (e.g., HIV, influenza, RSV, rabies) and tumor-associated antigens (e.g., HPV). This review is among the first to highlight breakthroughs in the application of AI for antigen screening, mRNA sequence optimization, lipid component selection, and vaccine stability prediction. Finally, the review addresses current platform limitations and proposes future directions for interdisciplinary collaboration, offering both theoretical insights and practical recommendations for the safe and effective implementation of next-generation mRNA vaccines.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The authors stress that a better understanding of how mRNA vaccines and their delivery systems work could help improve their effectiveness and safety.

Aim of the study: mRNA-based vaccines are emerging as a promising alternative to standard cancer treatments and the conventional vaccines. Moreover, the FDA-approval of three nucleic acid based therapeutics (Onpattro, BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) has further increased the interest and trust on this type of therapeutics.

Results: In order to achieve a significant therapeutic efficacy, the mRNA needs from a drug delivery system. In the last years, several delivery platforms have been explored, being the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) the most well characterized and studied. A better understanding on how mRNA-based therapeutics operate (both the mRNA itself and the drug delivery system) will help to further improve their efficacy and safety. In this review, we will provide an overview of what mRNA cancer vaccines are and their mode of action and we will highlight the advantages and challenges of the different delivery platforms that are under investigation.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Horizon 2020, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The study indicates greater vaccine reactogenicity, especially in younger adults, and the need for continued post-marketing safety monitoring.

Aim of the study: Seasonal influenza remains a major global public health challenge despite decades of vaccine development, underscoring the need for more effective and adaptable immunization strategies. The recently approved mRNA-1010 vaccine represents a promising advance by applying messenger RNA technology to a pathogen characterized by continuous antigenic drift.

Results: However, increased reactogenicity, particularly among younger adults, together with the need for continued post-marketing safety surveillance, highlights the balance between enhanced immune responses and tolerability. Beyond seasonal influenza, mRNA-1010 provides a foundation for next-generation respiratory vaccines, including combination formulations targeting influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), while illustrating the broader potential of mRNA vaccine technology. At the same time, challenges related to manufacturing scalability, cost, cold-chain requirements, and global accessibility remain important considerations for widespread implementation. This perspective examines whether mRNA-1010 represents an incremental advance in influenza vaccination or a potential transformative milestone in respiratory immunization, while considering the continuing roles of alternative vaccine platforms in achieving optimal effectiveness, safety, and equitable global access.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review points to concerns about formulation stability, safety and vaccine reactions, as well as the durability of protection.

Aim of the study: mRNA vaccines have become a clinically validated vaccine platform, as demonstrated by the success of COVID-19 vaccines such as Comirnaty and Spikevax, owing to their rapid design, manufacturing scalability, and capacity to induce in situ antigen expression.

Results: Despite remarkable progress, challenges related to formulation stability, long-term storage stability, safety and reactogenicity concerns, and durability of immune protection continue to hinder the broader application of mRNA-LNP vaccine platforms. This review provides an integrated overview of recent advances in mRNA-LNP vaccines, covering mRNA molecular engineering, LNP composition and delivery mechanisms, immune responses, clinical progress, and current developmental challenges. Furthermore, emerging strategies, including thermostable formulations, next-generation LNPs with improved targeting capability, emerging RNA platforms, and artificial intelligence-assisted optimization of RNA sequences and lipid materials, are discussed.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Perspectives and opinion materials

The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Vera Hassner Sharav writes: "Public health officials on both sides of the Atlantic have lost the public trust because they have been in league with vaccine manufacturers in denying that safety problems exist. If vaccines posed no safety problems why has the US Vaccine Court awarded more than $2 billion dollars to settle 2,500 cases involving vaccine-related debilitating injuries in children?" (8) When US FDA officials analyzed the data on autism and thimerosal-containing vaccines they found a clear link. Their response, detailed in transcripts of a meeting at Simpsonwood, VA in July 2000 was to "massage" the data to make the link go away (9).”Vera Hassner Sharav writes: "Public health officials on both sides of the Atlantic have lost the public trust because they have been in league with vaccine manufacturers in denying that safety problems exist. If vaccines posed no safety problems why has the US Vaccine Court awarded more than $2 billion dollars to settle 2,500 cases involving vaccine-related debilitating injuries in children?" (8) When US FDA officials analyzed the data on autism and thimerosal-containing vaccines they found a clear link. Their response, detailed in transcripts of a meeting at Simpsonwood, VA in July 2000 was to "massage" the data to make the link go away (9).
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Balancing both the benefits and risks is essential for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of vaccination programs.”Balancing both the benefits and risks is essential for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of vaccination programs.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„VAERS The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is a US program to monitor vaccine safety, created by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). . The records of adverse effects including deaths following immunization with mRNA products in three years is much greater than the total number of adverse effects recorded for all vaccines since 1990 (34 years ago). Examining VAERS data during the first year of mRNA inoculations finds that one year of COVID inoculations compared to 30 years of all other vaccines combined the number of adverse events and disabling events are comparable.”VAERS The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is a US program to monitor vaccine safety, created by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). . The records of adverse effects including deaths following immunization with mRNA products in three years is much greater than the total number of adverse effects recorded for all vaccines since 1990 (34 years ago). Examining VAERS data during the first year of mRNA inoculations finds that one year of COVID inoculations compared to 30 years of all other vaccines combined the number of adverse events and disabling events are comparable.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.