„我们表明,这项研究显然预示了血栓和其他不良反应的严重风险。后续临床试验未能监测和评估这些风险,加上审查过程存在严重疏忽,并伴随紧急使用授权,最终可预见地造成了一场前所未有的医疗灾难。”We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.
„由于官方批准的仓促做法以及COVID-19疫苗研发和审批中的系统性严重疏忽,我们对其药代动力学了解得很不充分。迄今为止公开的、内容相对详细的动物研究只有一项,涉及辉瑞疫苗[1, 2]。”Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].
„他们分析了8项研究、7种COVID-19疫苗和超过150,000名受试者,发现与未接种疫苗的对照组相比,mRNA疫苗的不良事件风险最高:第一剂后风险增加1.83倍(95% CI 1.80-1.86),第二剂后增加2.16倍(95% CI 2.11-2.20)。”In their analysis of eight studies, seven COVID-19 vaccines, and over 150,000 subjects, they found that the mRNA vaccines showed the highest risk of adverse events compared to unvaccinated controls, with 1.83 times (95% CI 1.80-1.86) and 2.16 times (95% CI 2.11-2.20) increased risk of an adverse event after the first and second dose, respectively.
„报告最多的全身性反应是发烧、疲劳和头痛。Fraiman等人评估了辉瑞BNT162b2和Moderna mRNA-1273疫苗III期临床试验数据中的严重不良事件(SAE)和特别关注的严重不良事件(AESI)[277]。”The most common types of systemic reactions reported were fever, fatigue and headache. Fraiman et al. assessed serious adverse events (SAE) and serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) in phase III clinical trial data for the Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines [277].
„孕妇和哺乳期母亲被排除在简化且草率的临床试验之外,但在获得紧急使用授权(EUA)后,仍被鼓励立即接种疫苗。这意味着她们的生育能力和婴儿健康面临不可接受的风险(见第7.7节)。”Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers, who had been excluded from the abridged and perfunctory clinical trials, were nevertheless encouraged to receive the vaccines immediately after the EUAs had been given, which implies unacceptable risks for their fertility and for the health of infants (see Section 7.7).
„但不仅没有充分理由考虑此类紧急使用授权,授权的颁发还依据了生产商提供的不完整且明显具有欺诈性的文件。第2.9节列出了一些欺诈证据;监管机构本应发现这些问题,但显然没有发现。”But not only was there no valid rationale for even contemplating such EUAs—the issuance was based on incomplete and patently fraudulent documentation provided by the manufacturers. Some evidence of such fraud, which should have been caught by the regulators but apparently wasn’t, is presented here in Section 2.9.
„英国暂停为容易出现严重过敏反应的人接种疫苗,https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html
英国:过敏者不应接种疫苗,https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192
对过敏的人不应接种辉瑞和BioNTech公司的疫苗,https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551
英国药品与保健品管理局”Wielka Brytania wstrzymuje sczepienia osób ze skłonnością do silnych reakcji alergicznych, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html
Wielka Brytania: szczepienia nie dla alergików, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192
Osoby z alergiami nie powinny przyjmować szczepionki firmy Pfizer i BioNTech, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551
Brytyjska agencja ds.
研究经费政府、公共机构 · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, National Natural Science Foundation of China
研究经费政府、公共机构 · Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
作者与公司有关联吗?没有——作者如此声明
生产商是否参与协助研究?否
研究类型对其他研究的讨论
“未注明”并不代表无人出资——数据库并不总会记录。
观点与评论材料
以下内容为作者的观点、解读和假设,不与科学研究和系统评价同等看待。
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service 观点材料
„Vera Hassner Sharav写道:“大西洋两岸的公共卫生官员已经失去了公众的信任,因为他们与疫苗生产商串通,否认存在安全问题。如果疫苗没有安全问题,为什么美国疫苗法院会裁定支付超过20亿美元,以解决2500起涉及儿童因疫苗而遭受严重损伤的案件?”(8)美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的官员分析自闭症和含硫柳汞疫苗的数据时,发现了明确联系。他们在2000年7月于弗吉尼亚州辛普森伍德举行的会议记录中详细记载了自己的应对方式:对数据进行“加工”,让这种联系消失(9)。”Vera Hassner Sharav writes: "Public health officials on both sides of the Atlantic have lost the public trust because they have been in league with vaccine manufacturers in denying that safety problems exist. If vaccines posed no safety problems why has the US Vaccine Court awarded more than $2 billion dollars to settle 2,500 cases involving vaccine-related debilitating injuries in children?" (8) When US FDA officials analyzed the data on autism and thimerosal-containing vaccines they found a clear link. Their response, detailed in transcripts of a meeting at Simpsonwood, VA in July 2000 was to "massage" the data to make the link go away (9).
„VAERS(疫苗不良事件报告系统)是美国的疫苗安全监测项目,由美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和食品药品监督管理局(FDA)创建。三年内,接种mRNA产品后出现的不良反应记录(包括死亡)的数量,远远超过自1990年(34年前)以来所有疫苗不良反应记录的总数。查看mRNA接种第一年的VAERS数据可以发现,将一年的COVID疫苗接种与过去30年所有其他疫苗接种合计相比,不良事件和致残事件的数量相当。”VAERS The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is a US program to monitor vaccine safety, created by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). . The records of adverse effects including deaths following immunization with mRNA products in three years is much greater than the total number of adverse effects recorded for all vaccines since 1990 (34 years ago). Examining VAERS data during the first year of mRNA inoculations finds that one year of COVID inoculations compared to 30 years of all other vaccines combined the number of adverse events and disabling events are comparable.