PisaczekSearch
文AEN
Vaccines

Pfizer vaccine — what side effects came to light over time?

Sources: 7 · Article: 11 175 characters

Jerzy Zięba says that two people experienced anaphylactic shock after their first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, and four volunteers developed Bell’s palsy.

  • Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi cites the authors’ claim that an animal study had foreshadowed the risk of blood clots and other adverse effects.
  • The STOP NOP Association points out that rare adverse effects may come to light when vaccines are used on a large scale, if they are effectively monitored.
  • Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi also says that knowledge about how the Pfizer vaccine spreads through the body and is eliminated was limited.

What the authors write

Jerzy Zięba

Two people experienced anaphylactic shock after the first dose, and four volunteers developed Bell’s palsy.

„Two people who received the first dose of the vaccine experienced anaphylactic shock. Four volunteers developed Bell’s palsy. No further details are known about their health. The information was reported by the media. Below is a list of publications where you can find information about these side effects, to ensure that you have access to the information.”U dwóch osób, które przyjęły pierwszą dawkę szczepionki wystąpił wstrząs anafilaktyczny. U 4 ochotników wystąpiło porażenie Bella. Nie są znane dodatkowe szczegóły dotyczące stanu ich zdrowia. Informacje te zostały podana przez media. Poniżej przedstawiam listę publikacji, w których znajdziecie informacje na temat tych efektów ubocznych by zapewnić Państwu dostęp do informacji.
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

The authors claimed that an animal study had foreshadowed a serious risk of blood clots and other adverse effects.

„We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.”We show that this study clearly presaged grave risks of blood clotting and other adverse effects. The failure to monitor and assess these risks in the subsequent clinical trials, and the grossly negligent review process in conjunction with the emergency use authorizations, have predictably resulted in an unprecedented medical disaster.
Stowarzyszenie STOP NOP

Rare adverse effects may come to light only when vaccines are used on a large scale, if they are effectively monitored.

„The side effects of vaccines are also described in their leaflets and product characteristics. However, rare adverse effects come to light only when vaccines are used on a mass scale, provided that this use is effectively monitored.”Skutki uboczne szczepionek zostały również opisane w ich ulotkach oraz charakterystykach produktu leczniczego, natomiast działania niepożądane występujące rzadko ujawniają się dopiero podczas stosowania szczepionek w skali masowej, o ile jest ono skutecznie monitorowane.
Jerzy Zięba

The cited headline warned people with serious allergies about the Pfizer vaccine.

„UK suspends vaccination of people prone to severe allergic reactions, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html UK: no vaccination for people with allergies, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192 People with allergies should not receive the Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551 British medicines agency: People with serious allergies should not receive the Covid-19 vaccine, https://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Serwis-Szczepienia/Brytyjska-agencja-ds-lekow-osoby-z-powaznymi-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-przeciw-Covid-19,216270,1018.html”Wielka Brytania wstrzymuje sczepienia osób ze skłonnością do silnych reakcji alergicznych, https://www.medonet.pl/koronawirus-pytania-i-odpowiedzi/leczenie-koronawirusa,wielka-brytania-wstrzymuje-szczepienia-przeciwko-koronawirusowi-osob-ze-sklonnoscia-do-silnych-reakcji-alergicznych,artykul,19327261.html Wielka Brytania: szczepienia nie dla alergików, https://wydarzenia.interia.pl/news-wielka-brytania-szczepionka-nie-dla-alergikow,nId,4905192 Osoby z alergiami nie powinny przyjmować szczepionki firmy Pfizer i BioNTech, https://www.rmf24.pl/raporty/raport-koronawirus-z-chin/najnowsze-fakty/news-osoby-z-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-firmy-p,nId,4906551 Brytyjska agencja ds. leków: osoby z poważnymi alergiami nie powinny przyjmować szczepionki przeciw Covid-19, https://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Serwis-Szczepienia/Brytyjska-agencja-ds-lekow-osoby-z-powaznymi-alergiami-nie-powinny-przyjmowac-szczepionki-przeciw-Covid-19,216270,1018.html
Jerzy Zięba

The cited headlines reported two adverse reactions and an allergy warning after vaccination with the Pfizer vaccine.

„UK warns people with serious allergies to avoid Pfizer vaccine after two adverse reactions, https://ca.reuters.com/article/idCAKBN28J1D1 Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122 Two in U.K.”UK warns people with serious allergies to avoid Pfizer vaccine after two adverse reactions, https://ca.reuters.com/article/idCAKBN28J1D1 Covid-19 vaccine: Allergy warning over new jab, https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122 Two in U.K.
Jerzy Zięba

The cited headlines described four cases of Bell’s palsy among participants in Pfizer vaccine trials.

„Four trial volunteers who got Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine developed Bell's palsy”Four trial volunteers who got Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine developed Bell's palsy
Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi

The authors wrote that knowledge about how the Pfizer vaccine spreads through the body and is eliminated was limited.

„Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].”Because of the officially sanctioned haste and systematic gross negligence in the development and approval of the COVID-19 vaccines, our knowledge of their pharmacokinetics is sketchy. The only somewhat detailed animal study that has reached the public pertains to the Pfizer vaccine [1, 2].

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 4 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 80.

In a two-year follow-up after Pfizer vaccination, the most frequently recorded events were arthritis or joint pain, allergic reactions, and miscarriages or stillbirths; most events of special interest did not require hospitalization.

Aim of the study: COVID-19 vaccines were initially authorized based on short-term data from Phase 3 clinical trials in a highly selected population. This study assessed the long-term safety of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 and variation in adverse event rates across clinically important subgroups.

Results: Of the 9518 participants (median age 36.6 years) in the primary safety population (vaccinated with BNT162b2 within 10 days of enrollment), most were female (69.0%), White (66.1%), and non-Hispanic (75.2%). The most frequent baseline health conditions were obesity/overweight (24.4%), hypertension (11.9%), and asthma (11.6%). The overall AESI rate was 13.65 per 1000 person-years. Most AESIs did not result in hospitalization (67.4%). The most common AESIs per 1000 person-years were arthritis/arthralgia (3.32), non-anaphylactic allergic reactions (2.84), and spontaneous abortion/stillbirth (3.10). The rate of all other AESIs was <1.0 per 1000 person-years. Unadjusted AESI rates (IRR; 95% CI) were higher in risk intervals than control intervals (2.32; 1.54-3.51) but were attenuated following adjustment for age (0.95; 0.53-1.72).

Money for the studycompany together with others · Pfizer, Duke Clinical Research Institute
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?YES
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants19 858

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In a survey, participants reported, among other things, chronic fatigue, cognitive problems, and irregular periods over time, but fatigue was less common after Pfizer than after AstraZeneca.

Aim of the study: During the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccinations were highly beneficial to public health, preventing disease and reducing mortality. This study aimed to investigate long-term adverse clinical symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination with the Oxford AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Oxford), Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2), and Moderna (mRNA-1273) vaccines.

Results: Menstrual irregularity was slightly higher among females who received Pfizer-BioNTech (14.8%) than among Oxford AstraZeneca recipients (18.9%). The highest proportion of recipients who were infected after vaccination was among those who received the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine (46.3%). In conclusion, the most commonly reported long-term adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination were chronic fatigue, cognitive impairment, and menstrual irregularity. Further large-scale studies are required to provide more conclusive evidence.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · Deanship of Scientific Research, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University10.13039/501100023673
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants429

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Nearly a year of follow-up found no significant or persistent changes in platelet aggregation after successive doses of Pfizer.

Aim of the study: There is a global concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines associated with platelet function. However, their long-term effects on overall platelet activity remain poorly understood.

Results: There is a global concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines associated with platelet function. However, their long-term effects on overall platelet activity remain poorly understood. Here we address this problem by image-based single-cell profiling and temporal monitoring of circulating platelet aggregates in the blood of healthy human subjects, before and after they received multiple Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine doses over a time span of nearly 1 year. Results show no significant or persisting platelet aggregation trends following the vaccine doses, indicating that any effects of vaccinations on platelet turnover, platelet activation, platelet aggregation, and platelet-leukocyte interaction was insignificant.

Money for the studycompany together with others · Intramural NIH HHS, Nakatani Foundation for Advancement of Measuring Technologies in Biomedical Engineering, National Institutes of Health
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The study found no increased risk of stroke after vaccination, including more than a year after vaccination.

Aim of the study: This study investigated the association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA vaccination and stroke in Qatar.

Results: The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for vaccination among cases compared to controls was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00). The aOR was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.45-1.23) for a single vaccine dose, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.73-1.04) for primary-series vaccination (two doses), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.66-1.25) for booster vaccination (three or more doses). The aOR was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72-1.04) for BNT162b2 and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.67-1.11) for mRNA-1273. Subgroup analyses, considering different durations since vaccination, also demonstrated no association. Subgroup analyses based on nationality, age, number of coexisting conditions, or prior infection status yielded similar results. Subgroup analysis, stratified by stroke type, suggested an association between vaccination and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (aOR of 2.50 [95% CI: 0.97-6.44]), but it did not reach statistical significance.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyobservation of people

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.