PisaczekSearch
文AEN
Diet and nutrition

Fasting and starvation — a way to good health or a dangerous trend?

Sources: 10 · Article: 12 209 characters

Bracia Rodzeń describes healthy fasting as voluntarily choosing not to eat, without being forced to, for health benefits.

  • With the 16/8 method, you eat for 8 hours and do not eat for the remaining 16 hours.
  • Bracia Rodzeń also notes that the break between dinner at 7:00 p.m. and breakfast at 7:00 a.m. is a natural 12-hour fast.
  • These descriptions do not give specific benefits or risks, so they do not establish whether fasting is effective or whether it can be dangerous.

What the authors write

Bracia Rodzeń

Healthy fasting means voluntarily choosing not to eat for a set period of time in order to achieve health benefits.

„Healthy fasting means voluntarily choosing not to eat for a set period of time in order to achieve specific health benefits. Fasts differ in how long they last and which drinks are allowed during them—water, tea, coffee, or broth. Fasting is really any period during which you do not eat.”Post zdrowy to dobrowolne, niewymuszone niejedzenie przez określony okres czasu, celem osiągnięcia określonych korzyści zdrowotnych. Posty różnią się długością trwania oraz dozwolonymi produktami do picia w trakcie – woda, herbata, kawa, rosół. Post to tak naprawdę każdy okres, w którym nie jesz.
Bracia Rodzeń

With the 16/8 method, you eat for 8 hours and fast for the remaining 16 hours.

„A day has 24 hours. Divide it into 8 hours when you eat and the remaining 16 hours when you fast—that is, 16 hours without eating, or #healthyNOTeating. We call those 8 hours your eating window. During these 8 hours, when you eat your meals, you decide for yourself and fit your eating window around your life, work, and responsibilities.”Doba ma 24 godziny, podziel ją na 8 godzin, w trakcie których jesz i pozostałe 16 godzin, podczas których pościsz,czyli jest to 16 godzin niejedzenia, #zdrowegoNIEjedzenia. Te 8 godzin nazywamy okienkiem żywieniowym. W ciągu tych 8 godzin, w których jesz posiłki, to właśnie Ty decydujesz i dostosowujesz sobie okienko żywieniowe do życia, pracy i obowiązków, które masz.
Bracia Rodzeń

Bracia Rodzeń describes 16/8 fasting as one of the most widely studied topics in nutrition and lifestyle.

„#healthyNOTeating16/8, or intermittent fasting, is one of the most widely studied scientific topics in nutrition and lifestyle. You eat during the 8-hour “eating window.” Healthy fasting means voluntarily choosing not to eat for a set period of time in order to achieve specific health benefits.”#zdroweNIEjedzenie16/8, czyli post przerywany, jest jednym z najczęściej badanych naukowo tematów dotyczących żywienia i stylu życia. Jeszw trakcie 8 godzinnego “okna żywieniowego”. Post zdrowy to dobrowolne, niewymuszone niejedzenie przez określony okres czasu, celem osiągnięcia określonych korzyści zdrowotnych.
Bracia Rodzeń

The break between dinner at 7:00 p.m. and breakfast at 7:00 a.m. lasts 12 hours and is described as a natural fast.

„Let’s say you had dinner at 7:00 p.m. and then breakfast at 7:00 a.m.—you fast for 12 hours naturally, often without realizing it. If your eating day looks like this, you fast for 12 hours every day.”Powiedzmy, że zjadłaś/eś kolację o godzinie 19:00, a następnie śniadanie o 7:00 – pościsz przez 12 godzin w sposób naturalny, często bez uświadamiania tego sobie. Jeśli Twój dzień jedzeniowy wygląda właśnie w powyższy sposób, to codziennie pościsz 12 godzin.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 5 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 54 000.

A meta-analysis found that various forms of intermittent fasting reduced body weight compared with unrestricted eating.

Aim of the study: To assess the effects of intermittent fasting diets, diets with continuous energy restriction, and unrestricted (ad libitum) diets on intermediate cardiometabolic outcomes in randomized clinical trials.

Results: The review identified 99 randomized clinical trials involving 6,582 adults with varying health conditions (720 healthy participants and 5,862 with existing health conditions). All intermittent fasting and continuous energy restriction diet strategies reduced body weight compared with an ad libitum diet. Compared with continuous energy restriction, alternate-day fasting was the only intermittent fasting strategy that showed a benefit in body weight reduction (mean difference: -1.29 kg (95% CI -1.99 to -0.59), moderate certainty of evidence). In addition, alternate-day fasting led to a small reduction in body weight compared with both time-restricted eating and whole-day fasting (mean differences: -1.69 kg (-2.49 to -0.88) and -1.05 kg (-1.90 to -0.19), respectively; both with moderate certainty of evidence).

Money for the studycompany together with others · NIDDK NIH HHS, The Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group (DNSG) of the European Association of the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Do the authors have ties to companies?yes — the authors reported it
Did a manufacturer help with the study?YES
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)
Participants6 582

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

A review found weight loss in intermittent fasting studies and, among people with type 2 diabetes, improved blood sugar control.

Aim of the study: To examine the evidence for intermittent fasting (IF), an alternative to calorie-restricted diets, as a treatment for obesity, an important health concern in Canada where few effective office-based treatment strategies are available.

Results: Intermittent fasting shows promise for treating obesity. So far, studies have been small and short. Longer-term research is needed to understand the sustainable role IF can play in weight loss.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

A meta-analysis found that intermittent fasting may be an alternative to calorie restriction, and alternate-day fasting had the best weight-loss results among the regimens studied.

Aim of the study: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of different intermittent fasting (IF) regimens for weight loss in the general population and compare them with traditional caloric energy restriction (CER).

Results: The exploratory random-effects network analysis of 24 RCTs (n = 1,768) ranked ADF as the most effective, followed by CER and TRE. The meta-analysis showed that IF regimens resulted in weight loss similar to CER (mean difference 0.26 kg, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.84; p = 0.37). Compliance was generally high (>80%) in trials lasting less than 3 months. This meta-analysis concludes that IF is comparable to CER and is a promising alternative for weight loss. Of the three regimens, ADF was the most effective for weight loss, followed by CER and TRE. Further well-powered RCTs with longer interventions are needed to draw firm conclusions.

Money for the studycompany or manufacturer · Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., Nestlé Health Sciences
Do the authors have ties to companies?yes — the authors reported it
Did a manufacturer help with the study?YES
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)
Participants1 768

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

A review found that eating within a restricted time window was associated with an average body weight reduction of 3% and a loss of body fat.

Aim of the study: Recent observations have shown that extending the daily eating period may contribute to the onset of chronic diseases. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a diet that specifically limits this daily eating window. It may be a dietary approach that improves health markers. The aim of this study was to review how time-restricted eating affects human health.

Results: Of the 494 articles collected, 23 were included in the analysis. Overall adherence to TRE was 80%, with an unintended 20% reduction in calorie intake. TRE led to an average weight loss of 3% and a loss of fat mass. This fat loss was also seen without any calorie restriction. Interestingly, TRE produced beneficial metabolic effects independently of weight loss, suggesting an intrinsic effect based on aligning eating patterns with the circadian clock. TRE is a simple, well-tolerated diet that produces many beneficial health effects based on the principles of chrononutrition. However, more rigorous studies are needed to confirm these effects, understand their mechanisms, and assess their relevance to human health.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

A review found that alternate-day fasting and whole-day fasting were associated with reductions in body weight and body fat, as well as improvements in some blood lipid measures.

Aim of the study: Intermittent fasting is a broad term for a range of programs that change when people eat by using short-term fasts to improve body composition and overall health. This review examines studies of intermittent fasting programs to determine whether they improve body composition and clinical health markers associated with disease.

Results: Alternate-day fasting trials lasting 3 to 12 weeks appear to effectively reduce body weight (≈3%-7%), body fat (≈3-5.5 kg), total cholesterol (≈10%-21%), and triglycerides (≈14%-42%) in people who are normal-weight, overweight, or obese. Whole-day fasting trials lasting 12 to 24 weeks also reduce body weight (≈3%-9%) and body fat, and improve blood lipids (≈5%-20% reduction in total cholesterol and ≈17%-50% reduction in triglycerides). Research on time-restricted feeding is limited, so no clear conclusions can be drawn at present. Future studies should examine the long-term effects of intermittent fasting and the possible combined effects of intermittent fasting and exercise.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Perspectives and opinion materials

The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„5.2 Intermittent Fasting Improves Vitamin D Resistance Recent studies indicate that intermittent fasting and prolonged fasting can improve vitamin D levels and its metabolism, particularly in people with various health conditions. Effects of Prolonged Fasting on Vitamin D: Both intermittent and prolonged fasting have shown promise in increasing vitamin D levels and may be useful strategies for managing vitamin D resistance and related health conditions.”5.2 Intermittent Fasting Improves Vitamin D Resistance Recent studies indicate that intermittent fasting and prolonged fasting can improve vitamin D levels and its metabolism, particularly in individuals with various health conditions. Effects of Prolonged Fasting on Vitamin D: Both intermittent and prolonged fasting have shown promise in enhancing vitamin D levels and may serve as beneficial strategies in managing vitamin D resistance and related health conditions.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„The authors concluded that intermittent fasting may have beneficial effects on a range of health outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity. IF may reduce several metabolic health measures, such as waist circumference, fat mass, LDL-C, triglycerides, cholesterol, fasting insulin, and blood pressure, while increasing HDL-C and muscle mass (fat-free mass). Below is a brief review of intermittent fasting studies: Studies showing cardiovascular health benefits of intermittent fasting: Intermittent fasting (IF) has been shown to have a range of potential benefits for cardiovascular health.”The authors concluded that intermittent fasting may have beneficial effects on a range of health outcomes for adults with overweight or obesity. IF may decrease many metabolic health parameters such waist circumference, fat mass, LDL-C, Triglycerides, cholesterol, fasting insulin, and blood pressure, while increasing HDL-C and muscle (fat free mass). Below is a brief review of intermittent fasting studies: Studies showing benefits of intermittent fasting on cardiovascular health: Intermittent fasting (IF) has been shown to have a range of potential benefits for cardiovascular health.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Numerous studies have shown the potential benefits of intermittent fasting for cardiovascular health, weight loss, metabolic health, brain function, longevity, and even autoimmune diseases and cancer (Sun 2024, Cheng 2024). These studies highlight the positive impact of intermittent fasting on various aspects of health and well-being. From an evolutionary perspective, human ancestors routinely fasted intermittently, which seems to have provided survival benefits.”Numerous studies have demonstrated the potential benefits of intermittent fasting for cardiovascular health, weight loss, metabolic health, brain function, longevity, and even autoimmune diseases and cancer (Sun 2024, Cheng 2024). These studies emphasize the positive impact of intermittent fasting on various aspects of health and well-being. From an evolutionary perspective, human ancestors were routinely on intermittent fasting which seems to bestow survival benefits.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.