Public health and WHOGlyphosate in food — are pesticides ending up on our plates?
- Jerzy Zięba — Glifosat w płodach rolnych
- Jerzy Zięba — Glifosat a zdrowie
- Hubert Czerniak — Zaparcia - jak zadbać o przewód pokarmowy?
- Hubert Czerniak — Dieta dla autystycznych dzieci
- Residues of carcinogenic pesticides in food: a systematic review. · Rev Environ Health 2024
- Preliminary data on glyphosate, glufosinate, and metabolite contamination in Italian honey samples. · Ital J Food Saf 2024
- Detection of glyphosate, glufosinate, and their metabolites in multi-floral honey for food safety. · Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess 2025
- Dietary exposure to glyphosate from breakfast cereals and snacks among Lebanese children and adolescents. · Food Res Int 2026
- Monitoring and risk assessment of pesticide residue in plant-soil-groundwater systxem about medlar planting in Golmud. · Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2021
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — Unveiling the Corporate Agenda Behind the Global Plant-Based Food Movement
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — From Regulation to Restoration: Reforming Food and Nutraceutical Policy for Public Health
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — Doctors Say Vitamins are Safe and Effective
Jerzy Zięba reports that in 2019 the permitted glyphosate level was exceeded in one tested buckwheat sample.
- In 2017, an exceedance was recorded in one tested pear sample, while levels in most of the agricultural products tested were below the limit.
- Hubert Czerniak claims that spraying potatoes, buckwheat and rapeseed before harvest means people consume more glyphosate.
- He also lists pasta, flour, dumplings, potatoes and pancakes as products that contain glyphosate and GMOs.
What the authors write
Glyphosate was detected below the maximum permitted level in most of the agricultural products tested, but there were some exceedances.
In 2019, glyphosate was detected in some of the rapeseed, millet and buckwheat samples tested, and the permitted limit was exceeded in one buckwheat sample.
In 2017, the permitted glyphosate level was exceeded in one tested pear sample.
Glyphosate residues can remain in soil and agricultural products, also contaminating subsequent crops and groundwater.
Glyphosate is detected in soil, groundwater and agricultural products, and these compounds can enter the body.
Hubert Czerniak lists pasta, flour, dumplings, potatoes and pancakes as products that contain glyphosate and GMOs.
Hubert Czerniak writes that farmers spray potatoes, buckwheat and rapeseed 2–3 weeks before harvest, causing people to consume more glyphosate.
Research from PubMed · Europe PMC
We selected 5 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.
Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 219.
A review indicates that glyphosate is among pesticides linked to carcinogenic effects, and pesticide residues have been detected in food.
Aim of the study: Most agricultural products are exposed to pesticides. Organochlorine (OCPs) insecticides have been banned for years due to their persistence in the environment and lipophilic properties.
Results: Organochlorine pesticides are primarily detected in foods of animal origin. In some studies, levels of carcinogenic organochlorine pesticides were above the permitted limits. Among the carcinogenic herbicides is glyphosate. An important finding of this systematic review is that carcinogenic organochlorines remain a threat in terms of cancer incidence.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Glyphosate was detected in eight of 30 honey samples from Italy, and trace amounts were found in another ten.
Aim of the study: Glyphosate and glufosinate are among the most widely used pesticides in agriculture worldwide. Their extensive use leads to the presence of their residues on crops and in the surrounding environment.
Results: Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the 30 honey samples found quantifiable levels of glyphosate in eight samples, with contamination ranging from 5.4 to 138.5 ng/g. Notably, one wildflower honey sample had residue levels nearly three times the maximum residue limit. Trace glyphosate contamination was also detected in another ten samples. Glufosinate and its metabolites were not detected in any of the samples within the detection ranges of the method used.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Glyphosate residues were detected in 12% of the multifloral honey samples tested, although none exceeded the EU limit.
Aim of the study: Beehives can accumulate environmental contaminants as bees gather pollen, propolis and water from their surroundings, contaminating hive products like honey. Moreover, in multifloral environments, bees can interact with plants treated with different pesticides, often causing higher pesticide concentrations in multifloral honey than in monofloral varieties.
Results: No sample exceeded the maximum residue levels set by EU regulations. Glufosinate and its metabolites were not detected in any samples. These findings underscore the need for continued monitoring of pesticide residues in honey, particularly given the potential ‘cocktail effect’ of multiple contaminants and their combined toxicity. This study highlights the importance of safeguarding consumer health, especially in vulnerable populations, by addressing gaps in data on pesticide residue levels.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Glyphosate was detected in all breakfast cereal and snack samples tested from Lebanon, but levels were below the established limit.
Aim of the study: Glyphosate, a broad-spectrum herbicide extensively utilized in global agriculture, had raised significant concerns regarding its persistence in food products alongside potential health risks. Although several studies have detected glyphosate residues in various food items, data on its presence in cereal-based products frequently consumed by Lebanese children and adolescents remain limited.
Results: Imported snacks had significantly higher residue levels (49.7 ppb) than locally produced items (30.6 ppb) (p = 0.0015). The dietary exposure assessment demonstrated that children's exposure to glyphosate through frequent consumption of breakfast cereals and snacks was minimal, with the highest exposure observed in the 4–8-year age group representing less than 0.031% of the most conservative Acceptable Daily Intake set by regulatory authorities. However, considering children's and adolescents' vulnerability to chronic, low-dose exposure, extensive monitoring programs targeting foods consumed by these age groups, along with additional research on total dietary exposure to glyphosate from various food sources, are recommended. These findings should be interpreted with caution given ongoing scientific debate regarding the adequacy of existing safety limits and potential long-term health effects.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Glyphosate was detected in the soil in the tested medlar-growing areas, where its average concentration was 0.21–1.3 mg/kg.
Aim of the study: Farm workers and consumers are vulnerable to potentially toxic pesticides accumulated in the environment and food. Nonetheless, few studies have investigated pesticide pollution and risk at medlar planting sites on a large scale.
Results: Using the monitoring data, potential health risks from fruit, soil and groundwater were evaluated. The HI and HQ could be considered safe for pesticide residues in fruit, soil and groundwater. Even if these results are generally safe to eat, the effects of insecticides on human health, especially genetic toxicity, have gradually drawn more attention. To minimize the increasing risk to human health, this study suggests that authorities regulate the use of agrochemicals and strengthen controls to ensure effective implementation of pesticide bans.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Perspectives and opinion materials
The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.
Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.