Download the appMore options
PisaczekSearch
文AEN
Public health and WHO

Fluoride and children’s brain development — what do doctors critical of fluoridation say?

Sources: 12 · Article: 17 935 characters

Nathan S. Bryan claims that the data show fluoride lowers children’s IQ and calls for stopping its addition to drinking water.

  • Jerzy Jaśkowski links environmental fluoride contamination to lower IQ and calls fluoride a neurotoxin that can cross the blood–brain barrier.
  • He also claims that children under three cannot excrete as much fluoride as they may swallow while brushing their teeth.

What the authors write

Jerzy Jaśkowski

Children may swallow fluoride while brushing their teeth, and Jerzy Jaśkowski claims that under three-year-olds cannot excrete that much of it.

„It is known that during normal toothbrushing a child may swallow as much as 5 mg of fluoride, while the daily requirement is about 1 mg. Before the age of three, the organs are not fully developed, and children cannot excrete that amount of the toxin. An excess of this element damages, among other things,”Wiadomo, że w czasie normalnego szczotkowania zębów dziecko może połknąć nawet do 5 mg fluoru, a dzienne zapotrzebowanie to ok. 1 mg. Do trzeciego roku życia narządy nie są w pełni wykształcone i dzieci nie potrafią wydalić takiej ilości toksyny. Nadmiar tego pierwiastka uszkadza m.in.
Jerzy Jaśkowski

Jerzy Jaśkowski calls fluoride a neurotoxin and claims that it can cross the blood–brain barrier.

„This neurotoxin crosses the blood–brain barrier, thereby making it easier for other toxic elements such as aluminum to enter. In the late 1980s, research papers discussed the link between environmental fluoride contamination and the occurrence of diabetes and cancer, as well as lower IQ.”Ta neurotoksyna przechodzi przez barierę krew-mózg ułatwiając tym samym drogę do wniknięcia innych toksycznych pierwiastków jak aluminium. O związku skażenia środowiska fluorem z występowaniem cukrzycy, chorób nowotworowych, obniżeniem IQ, pisało w swoich pracach w końcu lat 80.
Jerzy Jaśkowski

Jerzy Jaśkowski links environmental fluoride contamination to lower IQ.

„This neurotoxin crosses the blood–brain barrier, thereby making it easier for other toxic elements such as aluminum to enter. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, many authors wrote about the link between environmental fluoride contamination and the occurrence of diabetes and cancer, as well as lower IQ. The number of Polish-language publications on the subject exceeds one hundred.”Ta neurotoksyna przechodzi przez barierę krew-mózg ułatwiając tym samym drogę do wniknięcia innych toksycznych pierwiastków jak aluminium. O związku skażenia środowiska fluorem z występowaniem cukrzycy, chorób nowotworowych, obniżeniem IQ, pisało w swoich pracach w końcu lat 80. i początku lat 90. wielu autorów. Ilość polskojęzycznych publikacji dotyczących tematu przekracza setkę.
Nathan S. Bryan

Nathan S. Bryan claims that the data show fluoride lowers children’s IQ and calls for stopping its addition to drinking water.

„There is indisputable data now from the National Toxicology Program that fluoride decreases IQ in kids. In America 74% of municipalities have fluoride in the tap water. We get fluoride from the water we drink, the water we cook in, the water we bathe in.”There is indisputable data now from the National Toxicology Program that fluoride decreases IQ in kids. In America 74% of municipalities have fluoride in the tap water. We get fluoride from the water we drink, the water we cook in, the water we bathe in.
Nathan S. Bryan

Nathan S. Bryan lists water, dental products, toothpaste, and mouthwash as sources of fluoride exposure.

„We get fluoride from the water we drink, the water we cook in, the water we bathe in. We are getting fluoride from our dentists, from our toothpastes and many people use mouthwash with fluoride. This has to stop. Fortunately, there is a movement to remove fluoride from drinking water by the government.”We get fluoride from the water we drink, the water we cook in, the water we bathe in. We are getting fluoride from our dentists, from our toothpastes and many people use mouthwash with fluoride. This has to stop. Fortunately, there is a movement to remove fluoride from drinking water by the government.
Jerzy Jaśkowski

Jerzy Jaśkowski calls fluoride a known neurotoxin and accuses pediatricians of failing to warn parents about fluoride, including in toothpaste.

„It has been known for years that fluoride is a recognized neurotoxin, which, among other things, speeds up dementia in people. It is also one of the significant environmental factors that cause both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. I will not even mention that fluoride was used in both German concentration camps and Soviet labor camps to stupefy prisoners. Our study from the late 1990s showed that in Pruszcz Gdański municipality, exposed to fluoride contamination from production waste from the Gdańsk Phosphate Fertilizer Plant, we recorded the greatest increase in diabetes among young people in Poland. One might think that although food products are not tested for harmful effects on our health, at least when we take prescription medicines, we can be sure they are not poisoning us. Unfortunately, that is not the case. I would like to remind you that neither pediatricians nor diabetes associations warn parents about the possibility of poisoning children, for example with fluoride-containing toothpaste or with fluoride in general.”Wiadomo od lat, że fluor jest znaną neurotoksyną, wpływającą między innymi na przyspieszenie demencji u ludzi oraz jest jednym z istotnych czynników środowiskowych powodujących występowanie cukrzycy zarówno typu 1. jak i typu 2. Nie wspomnę, że fluor używano zarówno w niemieckich obozach koncentracyjnych, jak i sowieckich łagrach w celu otumaniania więźniów. Nasze badanie z końca lat 90. wykazały, że właśnie w gminie Pruszcz Gdański, narażonej na skażenie fluorem z odpadów poprodukcyjnych Gdańskich Zakładów Fosforowych, notujemy największy w Polsce wzrost zachorowań na cukrzycę u młodocianych. Zdawałoby się, że o ile produkty żywnościowe nie przechodzą żadnych badań dotyczących szkodliwości oddziaływania na nasze zdrowie, to przynajmniej spożywając lekarstwa kupowane na recepty, możemy być spokojni, że nas nie trują. Niestety, tak nie jest. Pragnę przypomnieć, że ani pediatrzy, ani Towarzystwa Diabetologiczne, nie ostrzegają rodziców o możliwości trucia dzieci np. pastami zawierającymi fluor czy w ogóle fluorem.
Jerzy Jaśkowski

Jerzy Jaśkowski claims that fluoride damages the thyroid and also links it to lower IQ.

„We also know that fluoride damages the thyroid, and dentists have been poisoning people with fluoride for 30 years. This leads to more diabetes among young people and causes hypothyroidism. IQ also falls and cancer rates rise because fluoride affects the pituitary gland and hormone production.”Wiemy też, że fl uor uszkadza tarczycę, a stomatolodzy od 30 lat trują ludzi fl uorem. Powoduje to wzrost cukrzycy u młodocianych i powstaje niedoczynność tarczycy, dodatkowo obniża się iQ i wzrasta zachorowalność na nowotwory, bo wpływa on na przysadkę i produkcje hormonu.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 7 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 33.

A meta-analysis found that children in groups with greater fluoride exposure had, on average, lower IQ scores, particularly when fluoride concentrations in water were higher.

Aim of the study: Many uncertainties still surround the possible harmful effect of fluoride exposure on cognitive neurodevelopment in children.

Results: A weaker and substantially linear decrease of -2.15 (95% CI -4.48; 0.18) IQ points with increasing urinary fluoride emerged above 0.28 mg/L (approximately reflecting a water fluoride content of 0.7 mg/L). The inverse association between fluoride exposure and IQ was particularly strong in the studies at high risk of bias, while no adverse effect emerged in the only study judged at low risk of bias. Overall, most studies suggested an adverse effect of fluoride exposure on children's IQ, starting at low levels of exposure. However, a major role of residual confounding could not be ruled out, thus indicating the need of additional prospective studies at low risk of bias to conclusively assess the relation between fluoride exposure and cognitive neurodevelopment.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review found that three of the studies analyzed reported an association between fluoride exposure and a higher risk of ADHD.

Aim of the study: Background and objectives: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by two dimensions: inattentiveness and hyperactivity/impulsivity. ADHD may be the result of complex interactions between genetic, biological and environmental factors possibly including fluoride exposure.

Results: Three studies reported a positive association with ADHD risk, all assessing exposure through fluoride levels. By using urinary fluoride, conversely, a positive correlation with inattention, internalizing symptoms, cognitive and psychosomatic problems was found in three studies, but no relation was found in the other one. Conclusions: The present review suggests that early exposure to fluoride may have neurotoxic effects on neurodevelopment affecting behavioral, cognitive and psychosomatic symptoms related to ADHD diagnosis. However, due to the heterogeneity of the studies included, current evidence does not allow to conclusively confirm that fluoride exposure is specifically linked to ADHD development.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Fondazione di Modena
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The authors concluded that the NTP review and meta-analysis found an association between greater fluoride exposure and lower IQ in children.

Aim of the study: We recently completed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on fluoride exposure and neurodevelopment and cognition, resulting in two publications. The 2024 National Toxicology Program Monograph concluded-with moderate confidence-that higher fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children.

Results: These publications have received considerable public and media attention, prompted healthy scientific discourse, and have been cited by public health decision‑makers. Many scientific comments were carefully considered and resolved during development and peer review, which contributed to the rigor of the final documents. However, some recurrent critiques continue to be raised. This viewpoint provides a high‑level summary of these key critiques and corresponding responses to help the public, media, and the scientific community better understand the strength and implications of the scientific evidence on fluoride exposures and neurodevelopment and cognition.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyother

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In boys, greater maternal fluoride intake during pregnancy was associated with a lower cognitive score at 24 months of age.

Aim of the study: Foods and beverages provide a source of fluoride exposure in Mexico. While high fluoride concentrations are neurotoxic, recent research suggests that exposures within the optimal range may also pose a risk to the developing brain.

Results: However, child sex modified the association between maternal fluoride intake and cognitive outcome (p interaction term = 0.06). A 0.5 mg/day increase in overall dietary fluoride intake was associated with a 3.50-point lower cognitive outcome in 24-month old boys (95 % CI: -6.58, -0.42); there was no statistical association with girls (β = 0.07, 95 % CI: -2.37, 2.51), nor on the cognitive outcome at 12-months of age. Averaging across the 12- and 24-month cognitive outcomes using mixed-effects models revealed a similar association: a 0.5 mg/day increase in overall dietary fluoride intake was associated with a 3.46-point lower cognitive outcome in boys (95 % CI: -6.23, -0.70). These findings suggest that the development of nonverbal abilities in males may be more vulnerable to prenatal fluoride exposure than language or motor abilities, even at levels within the recommended intake range.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIEHS NIH HHS, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants103

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the study, higher maternal urinary fluoride levels during pregnancy were associated with lower IQ scores in children.

Aim of the study: Prenatal exposure to fluoride has been associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, the neuropsychological profile of fluoride's developmental neurotoxicity at low levels and the stability of this relationship across childhood has not been characterized.

Results: The mean/median MUFCRE concentration was 0.90/0.83 mg/L (SD = 0.39; IQR, 0.64-1.11 mg/L). A 0.5 mg/L increase in MUFCRE predicted an average 2.12-point decrease in GCI/FSIQ (95% CI: -3.49, -0.75) and 2.63-point decrease in PIQ (95% CI: -3.87, -1.40). MUFCRE was marginally associated with VIQ across time (B = -1.29, 95% CI: -2.60, 0.01). No interactions between MUFCRE and child sex or MUFCRE and time were observed. The negative association between prenatal fluoride exposure and longitudinal IQ was driven by decrements in non-verbal intelligence (i.e. PIQ), suggesting that visual-spatial and perceptual reasoning abilities may be more impacted by prenatal fluoride exposure as compared to verbal abilities.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIEHS NIH HHS, NIDDK NIH HHS
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants386

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In boys, higher maternal fluoride levels during pregnancy were associated with lower IQ, particularly when mothers had low iodine levels.

Aim of the study: In animal studies, the combination of in utero fluoride exposure and low iodine has greater negative effects on offspring learning and memory than either alone, but this has not been studied in children. We evaluated whether the maternal urinary iodine concentration (MUIC) modifies the association between maternal urinary fluoride (MUF) and boys' and girls' intelligence.

Results: The MUICCRE by MUFCRE interaction was significant for boys (p = 0.042), but not girls (p = 0.190). For boys whose mothers had low iodine, a 0.5 mg/g increase in MUFCRE was associated with a 4.65-point lower FSIQ score (95% CI: -7.67, -1.62). For boys whose mothers had adequate iodine, a 0.5 mg/g increase in MUFCRE was associated with a 2.95-point lower FSIQ score (95% CI: -4.77, -1.13). These results suggest adequate iodine intake during pregnancy may minimize fluoride's neurotoxicity in boys.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · National Institute of Environmental Health Science, Chemicals Management Plan at Health Canada, Ontario Ministry of the Environment
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants366

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Higher maternal urinary fluoride levels during pregnancy were associated with poorer gross motor development in infants.

Aim of the study: Prenatal fluoride exposure, at United States (US) population relevant levels, has been associated with poorer child neurodevelopmental outcomes; however, no US study has examined whether these associations manifest in infancy. This study investigated associations between prenatal fluoride exposure and infants' neurodevelopment in Los Angeles, California.

Results: Among 346 mother-child pairs, the median (IQR) MUFSG was 0.79 (0.54-1.07) mg/L. Higher MUFSG was associated with worse gross motor performance (IRR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.45, p = 0.02). No significant associations were observed between MUFSG and fine motor: IRR = 1.15 (95% CI: 0.96-1.39), problem solving: IRR = 1.15 (95% CI: 0.90-1.48), personal-social: IRR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.83-1.31), or communication: IRR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71-1.14) scores. Third trimester fluoride exposure may increase risk of developmental neurotoxicity manifesting in infancy. Additional studies are needed to further explore this association across other US-based regions and the nation.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIEHS NIH HHS, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, US Environmental Protection Agency
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyobservation of people
Participants346

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Perspectives and opinion materials

The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Included in the studies we sent to EPA were 50 IQ studies that reported an association of fluoride exposure with the lowering of the IQ of children in China, India, and Iran. In November, I spoke with Richard Weisman of the Office of Water to ask about the status of the Proposed Rule. He said that he would ask his supervisor and would get back to me, which he did. He said that EPA will not be responding to our submission because a final determination was made not to include fluoride for review and that the next time EPA looks at fluoride for the Safe Water Drinking Act will be six years from now in 2023.”Included in the studies we sent to EPA were 50 IQ studies that reported an association of fluoride exposure with the lowering of the IQ of children in China, India, and Iran. In November, I spoke with Richard Weisman of the Office of Water to ask about the status of the Proposed Rule. He said that he would ask his supervisor and would get back to me, which he did. He said that EPA will not be responding to our submission because a final determination was made not to include fluoride for review and that the next time EPA looks at fluoride for the Safe Water Drinking Act will be six years from now in 2023.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„A child-sized toothbrush covered with a full strip of toothpaste holds approximately 0.75-1.0 g of toothpaste, and each gram of fluoride toothpaste, as formulated in the United States, contains approximately 1.0 mg of fluoride. Children aged less than 6 years swallow a mean of 0.3 g of toothpaste per brushing and can inadvertently swallow as much as 0.8 g." [1, emphasis added] For children age 6 and under, that is an average swallow of a third of the toothpaste they use, and a possibility of inadvertently swallowing 80% or more. There is about a milligram of fluoride in a single "serving" of toothpaste.”A child-sized toothbrush covered with a full strip of toothpaste holds approximately 0.75-1.0 g of toothpaste, and each gram of fluoride toothpaste, as formulated in the United States, contains approximately 1.0 mg of fluoride. Children aged less than 6 years swallow a mean of 0.3 g of toothpaste per brushing and can inadvertently swallow as much as 0.8 g." [1, emphasis added] For children age 6 and under, that is an average swallow of a third of the toothpaste they use, and a possibility of inadvertently swallowing 80% or more. There is about a milligram of fluoride in a single "serving" of toothpaste.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.