DiseasesDental materials — what is really in our mouths?
- Igor Dogocki — Usuwanie metali
- Igor Dogocki — Problemy z dziąsłami = Alzheimer?
- Igor Dogocki — Leczenie zębów biomateriałami
- Igor Dogocki — Toksyczność materiałów stomatologicznych
- Igor Dogocki — Stomatologia immunologiczna
- Heating and preheating of dental restorative materials-a systematic review. · Clin Oral Investig 2020
- Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. · J Prosthet Dent 2025
- Use of Vital Pulp Therapies in Primary Teeth 2024. · Pediatr Dent 2024
- Randomized controlled trial comparing glass-fiber versus metal posts in single-crowned teeth: 15 Year follow-up. · J Dent 2025
- Metal Alloys Used in Dental Prosthetics and Their Impact on the Oral Microbiome: Narrative Review. · Dent J (Basel) 2026
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — The Clinical Impact of Vitamin C: My Personal Experiences as a Physician
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — HYDROGEN PEROXIDE PROTECTION AGAINST COVID-19: AN OVERVIEW
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — The Silent Threat: Hidden Dental Infections and Their Devastating Impact on Health
Igor Dogocki points out that ingredients in dental resins can be released into the mouth, and studies described by the author found that HEMA, TEGDMA, and BisGMA were absorbed in animals.
- Mercury was listed in amalgams, and cadmium in materials used to fill root canal-treated teeth.
- The presence of metal does not automatically mean there is a problem; existing fillings, crowns, bridges, and implants can be assessed before treatment, and items are not removed without a clinical reason just because they contain metal.
- Among the metal-free options, the author lists ceramic implants and crowns.
What the authors write
The mouth may contain old amalgam fillings, crowns, bridges, inlays, prosthetic components, and titanium implants.
Metal components may contain different metal alloys.
Mercury was listed in amalgams, and cadmium in materials used to fill root canal-treated teeth.
Resin-based materials can release ingredients into the oral environment.
The compounds released can enter the body, and studies described by the author found that HEMA, TEGDMA, and BisGMA were absorbed in animals.
The author lists reactions such as asthma, eczema, and lichenoid reactions following dental restorations, and identifies HEMA and TEGDMA as triggers.
The author says that the presence of metal does not automatically mean there is a problem, although some people may experience local reactions or an allergy.
Symptoms in the mouth should not automatically be attributed to metals, as they can have various causes.
Existing fillings, crowns, bridges, and implants can be assessed before treatment, and materials are not removed without a clinical reason just because they contain metal.
Among the proposed metal-free options are ceramic implants and crowns.
Research from PubMed · Europe PMC
We selected 5 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.
Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 55 630.
The review found that heating resin materials may improve their mechanical and physical properties, although clinical confirmation is lacking.
Aim of the study: To perform a review on the influence of preheating and/or heating of resinous and ionomeric materials on their physical and mechanical properties and to discuss the benefits and methods of preheating/heating that have been used.
Results: At the end of reading the search titles and abstracts, 74 articles were selected. Preheating of composite resins reduces viscosity, facilitates adaptation to cavity preparation walls, increases the degree of conversion, and decreases the polymerization shrinkage. Preheating of resin cements improves strength, adhesion, and degree of conversion. Dental adhesives showed good results such as higher bond strength to dentin. However, unlike resinous materials, ionomeric materials have an increase in viscosity upon heating. Preheating improves the mechanical and physical properties. However, there is a lack of clinical studies to confirm the advantages of preheating technique.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
The review found that immediate dentin sealing was associated with less postoperative sensitivity.
Aim of the study: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to find and collect evidence on the clinical complication, success, and survival rates of indirect restorations delivered with immediate dentin sealing.
Results: A total of 11 studies were included in this review. The clinical complication rate was lower for immediately sealed dentin than for protocols without dentin sealing. The survival rate of restorations luted with the immediate dentin sealing protocol was higher (96.4% to 100%) than that of immediate dentin sealing (81.8% to 96.7%), negatively correlated with the observation time. The intensity and incidence of postoperative sensitivity were statistically significantly lower for restorations with immediate dentin sealing than for those without dentin sealing or conventionally cemented (P<.05). Immediate dentin-sealed indirect restorations had fewer clinical complications and higher success and survival rates than those delivered without dentin sealing. To avoid postoperative sensitivity or reduce its intensity, dentin surfaces should be sealed immediately after preparation. More long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm these evidence-based conclusions.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
In primary teeth with deep decay, calcium silicate cements used for pulpotomy had greater success than several other methods.
Aim of the study: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to present an evidence-based guideline for primary teeth with deep caries or trauma requiring vital pulp therapies (VPT). Methods: A systematic review/meta-analysis on vital primary teeth resulting from trauma or caries was conducted using GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for clinical recommendations.
Results: For vital primary incisors with deep caries, pulpotomy was significantly better statistically than pulpectomy. Teeth diagnosed with/without reversible pulpitis pain showed comparable success after 12 months of treatment by IPT or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy. The following had little or no significant effect on MTA pulpotomy success: coronal pulp removal methods; irrigation solution; method to control hemorrhage; base over MTA; treatment in one or two visits; anterior or posterior teeth. Conclusions: Indirect pulp treatment or calcium silicate cement pulpotomy is likely to increase vital pulp therapy success over other VPTs such as direct pulp capping and other pulpotomies after 24 months (moderate certainty).
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
After 15 years, glass-fiber posts showed a favorable survival trend, while root fractures occurred more often with metal posts.
Aim of the study: This randomized controlled trial compared the 15-year clinical success and survival rate of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass-fiber or metal posts.
Results: The mean follow-up time was 179.6 ± 7 months, and the recall rate was 91.6 %. Success rate was 48.0 % for metal posts, 59.2 % for prefabricated glass-fiber posts and 49.5 % for custom glass-fiber posts. Survival rate was 53.6 % for metal posts, 68.5 % for prefab glass-fiber posts and 55.3 % for custom glass-fiber posts. No statistically significant effect of post material was observed. There was, however, a trend towards better success/survival for teeth with prefabricated glass-fiber posts. Teeth with metal posts failed more frequently due to root fracture than teeth with glass-fiber posts. There was a trend towards better clinical success and survival rate for teeth restored with glass-fiber posts, even though post material had no statistically significant effect on the clinical outcome.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
The review indicates that gold, silver, and palladium alloys showed the best biocompatibility and antibacterial properties and limited biofilm accumulation.
Aim of the study: Introduction: One of the fundamental principles of modern medicine, including dentistry, is prevention. However, if treatment is not initiated, tooth loss can occur, necessitating the use of dental prostheses to restore the function and aesthetics of the stomatognathic system.
Results: In contrast, base metal alloys (cobalt-chromium and nickel-chromium) are highly susceptible to biocorrosion in acidic environments, which can encourage the growth of bacteria that cause tooth decay and inflammation, potentially exacerbating oral dysbiosis. Conclusions: The selection of materials plays a critical role in maintaining oral microbial homeostasis and preventing plaque-related diseases. High-noble alloys and titanium are more biocompatible than base metal alloys. However, further long-term clinical trials and multi-species biofilm models are needed to fully understand these interactions between materials and microbes.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Perspectives and opinion materials
The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.
Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.