Download the appMore options
PisaczekSearch
文AEN-US
Herbs and plants

Infant colic — is fennel tea really safe?

Sources: 7 · Article: 12 080 characters

Henryk Różański quotes Rudolf Franck’s recommendation: 0.2–2 g of fennel fruit several times a day, or an infusion made from 5–15 g of crushed fruit in 100 ml of boiling water.

  • Różański says that in the 19th century fennel was used, among other things, to prevent colic and relieve bloating.
  • The European Medicines Agency does not recommend medicines made from sweet fennel fruit for children under 4 because there is not enough information about their safe use in this age group.
  • The EMA recommendation applies to medicines made from sweet fennel fruit.

What the authors write

Henryk Różański

Henryk Różański quotes Rudolf Franck’s recommendation, which advised using fennel fruit for bloating, even in young children.

„In 1939, Dr Rudolf Franck recommended Fructus Foeniculi as a carminative (a remedy for relieving bloating), even for young children, at an oral dose of 0.2–2 g several times a day or as an infusion made from 5–15 g of crushed fruit in 100 ml of boiling water. It increases milk production and acts as an expectorant.”Dr Rudolf Franck (1939 r.) Fructus Foeniculi poleca jako carminativum (środek usuwający wzdęcia), nawet dla małych dzieci w dawce doustnej 0,2-2 g kilka razy dziennie lub w naparach 5-15 g rozdrobnionych owoców na 100 ml wrzącej wody. Zwiększa wydzielanie mleka i działa wykrztuśnie.
Henryk Różański

The historical recommendation quoted gives a dose of 0.2–2 g of fruit several times a day, or an infusion made from 5–15 g of crushed fruit in 100 ml of boiling water.

„In 1939, Dr Rudolf Franck recommended Fructus Foeniculi as a carminative (a remedy for relieving bloating), even for young children, at an oral dose of 0.2–2 g several times a day or as an infusion made from 5–15 g of crushed fruit in 100 ml of boiling water. It increases milk production and acts as an expectorant.”Dr Rudolf Franck (1939 r.) Fructus Foeniculi poleca jako carminativum (środek usuwający wzdęcia), nawet dla małych dzieci w dawce doustnej 0,2-2 g kilka razy dziennie lub w naparach 5-15 g rozdrobnionych owoców na 100 ml wrzącej wody. Zwiększa wydzielanie mleka i działa wykrztuśnie.
Henryk Różański

Henryk Różański says that in the 19th century fennel fruit was used, among other things, to prevent colic and relieve bloating.

„In the 19th century, fennel fruit was considered a stimulant, a diuretic, a digestive aid, a substance that loosened mucus in phlegm, a carminative and a galactagogue. It was used to treat weakness of the stomach and intestines, prevent colic, relieve bloating and treat inflammation of the digestive tract.”W XIX wieku owoc kopru uważano za środek pobudzający, moczopędny, wzmacniający trawienie, roztwarzający śluz w plwocinach, wiatropędny i mlekopędny. Używano w leczeniu osłabienia żołądka i jelit, w zapobieganiu kolek, przy wzdęciach i nieżytach przewodu pokarmowego.
Europejska Agencja Leków (EMA)

The EMA does not recommend medicines made from sweet fennel fruit for children under 4 because there is not enough information about their safe use in this age group.

„Because there is not enough information about the safe use of medicines made from sweet fennel fruit in children under 4, their use is not recommended for this age group. The dose and frequency of use depend on the intended use and the form of the medicine.”Ze względu na niewystarczające informacje o bezpiecznym stosowaniu leków otrzymywanych z owocu słodkiej odmiany kopru włoskiego u dzieci w wieku poniżej 4. roku życia, nie zaleca się stosowania tych leków w tej grupie wiekowej. Dawka leków otrzymywanych z owocu słodkiej odmiany kopru włoskiego oraz częstotliwość stosowania leków zależą od zastosowania i stosowanej postaci leku.
Europejska Agencja Leków (EMA)

The EMA says that medicines made from sweet fennel fruit are usually taken three or four times a day, for no longer than 1–2 weeks.

„The medicine is usually taken three to four times a day, and treatment should not last longer than 1–2 weeks. Further information can be found in the “Dosage” section of the entry for sweet fennel fruit on the Community list.”Lek przyjmuje się zazwyczaj trzy do czterech razy na dobę, a czas jego przyjmowania nie powinien przekraczać 1-2 tygodni. Dodatkowe informacje znajdują się w sekcji „Dawkowanie” wpisu na wspólnotową listę dotyczącego owocu słodkiej odmiany kopru włoskiego.
Europejska Agencja Leków (EMA)

The EMA lists allergic reactions affecting the skin or respiratory system and advises people who are allergic to sweet fennel not to use these medicines.

„The most common side effects associated with medicines made from sweet fennel fruit are allergic reactions affecting the skin or respiratory system. Medicines made from sweet fennel fruit should not be used by people who may be hypersensitive (allergic) to sweet fennel.”Najczęstsze działania niepożądane związane ze stosowaniem leków z owocu słodkiej odmiany kopru włoskiego to reakcje alergiczne dotyczące skóry lub układu oddechowego. Leków otrzymywanych z owocu słodkiej odmiany kopru włoskiego nie należy stosować u osób, u których może występować nadwrażliwość (uczulenie) na słodką odmianę kopru włoskiego.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 5 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 15.

A review suggests that preparations containing fennel oil may shorten crying time in infants with colic, although the authors point out that the evidence has limitations.

Aim of the study: To determine the strength of evidence for commonly used interventions for colic in breast-fed and mixed-fed infants younger than 6 months.

Results: A total of 17 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. The 6 studies included in the subgroup meta-analysis of probiotic treatment, particularly Lactobacillus reuteri, showed that probiotics appear to be an effective treatment, with an overall mean difference in crying time on day 21 of -55.8 min/day (95% CI -64.4 to -47.3, P = 0.001). The 3 studies included in the subgroup meta-analysis of preparations containing fennel suggest that they are effective, with an overall mean difference of -72.1 min/day (95% CI -126.4 to -17.7, P < 0.001). Probiotics, particularly L. reuteri, and preparations containing fennel oil appear effective in reducing colic, although these findings have limitations. Evidence for maternal dietary changes, lactase, sucrose, glucose and simethicone is weak. Further well-designed clinical trials are needed to strengthen the evidence for all these interventions.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studycombined analysis of many studies (meta-analysis)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the study, an emulsion of fennel seed oil resolved colic in a greater proportion of infants than placebo.

Aim of the study: Despite its benign, natural course, colic is a significant problem in infants and places a psychological, emotional and physical burden on parents. Dicyclomine hydrochloride is the only pharmacological treatment for infantile colic that has consistently been effective. Unfortunately, 5% of infants treated with dicyclomine hydrochloride develop serious side effects, including death.

Results: Fennel oil emulsion eliminated colic, according to the Wessel criteria, in 65% (40/62) of infants in the treatment group, significantly more than the 23.7% (14/59) in the control group (P < 0.01). Colic improved significantly more in the treatment group than in the control group [Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) = 41% (95% CI 25 to 57), Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = 2 (95% CI 2 to 4)]. No side effects were reported in either group during the trial. Our study suggests that fennel seed oil emulsion is superior to placebo in reducing the intensity of infantile colic.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studystudy with random allocation to groups (RCT)
Participants125

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

A preparation containing fennel, chamomile and lemon balm was associated with a greater reduction in crying time in infants than placebo.

Aim of the study: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to investigate the effectiveness and side effects of a phytotherapeutic agent containing Matricariae recutita, Foeniculum vulgare and Melissa officinalis in the treatment of infantile colic.

Results: A total of 88 infants completed the trial: 41 in the PA group and 47 in the control group. The average daily crying time in the PA group was 201.2 min/day (SD 18.3) at baseline and 76.9 min/day (SD 23.5) at the end of the study; in the placebo group, it was 198.7 min/day (SD 16.9) and 169.9 min/day (SD 23.1) (p < 0.005). Crying time decreased in 85.4% of subjects in the PA group and 48.9% of subjects in the placebo group (p < 0.005). No side effects were reported. This study shows that colic in breastfed infants improves within 1 week of treatment with an extract based on Matricariae recutita, Foeniculum vulgare and Melissa officinalis.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studystudy with random allocation to groups (RCT)
Participants93

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review reports encouraging results from studies of fennel extract and herbal mixtures, but highlights their limitations.

Aim of the study: Complementary and alternative medicines are often recommended for infantile colic, yet the evidence has not been synthesized to guide current practice on their use. To critically evaluate all randomized clinical trials of nutritional supplements and other complementary and alternative medicines as treatments for infantile colic.

Results: Fifteen randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included. Thirteen studies were placebo-controlled. Eight were of good methodological quality. Eleven trials reported a significant result in favor of complementary and alternative medicines. However, none of these randomized clinical trials was without flaws. Most approaches lacked independent replication. Some encouraging results were found for fennel extract, mixed herbal tea and sugar solutions, although it must be stressed that all the trials had major limitations. Therefore, the evidence from the included randomized clinical trials does not currently support the claim that any form of complementary and alternative medicine is effective for infantile colic. Further replications are needed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review suggests that fennel extract may relieve colic symptoms, although some concerns about the evidence remain.

Aim of the study: Infantile colic is a distressing condition characterized by excessive crying during the first few months of life. This research aimed to update the synthesis of evidence from the literature on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for infantile colic and establish what evidence is currently available.

Results: Sixteen systematic reviews were identified. Probiotics, fennel extract and spinal manipulation show promise in relieving colic symptoms, although some concerns remain. Acupuncture and soy are not currently recommended. Most of the reviews were assessed as having a high or unclear risk of bias and low confidence in their findings. There is a clear need for larger and methodologically stronger RCTs on the effectiveness of some CAM therapies for infantile colic. Particular attention to probiotics in non-breastfed infants is warranted.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol, National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Do the authors have ties to companies?yes — the authors reported it
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.