Public health and WHOMercury in fillings — can amalgam in the mouth be harmful?
- Piotr Witczak — Holistyczny Program Odnowy Organizmu
- Andrzej Frydrychowski — Jak oczyścić organizm z metali ciężkich, część 1
- Piotr Witczak — Stwardnienie rozsiane (SM) i zanikowe boczne (ALS) jako „choroby amalgamatowe”
- Dental amalgam restorations: daily mercury dose and biocompatibility. · J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2005
- Dental amalgam and human health. · Int Dent J 2003
- Alzheimer's disease, dental amalgam and mercury. · J Am Dent Assoc 1999
- Amalgam tooth fillings and man's mercury burden. · Hum Exp Toxicol 1994
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — Mercury Dental Amalgams Banned in 3 Countries
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — Heart Failure or Therapy Failure? Toxins Cause Cardiomyopathy
- Orthomolecular Medicine News Service — The Clinical Impact of Vitamin C: My Personal Experiences as a Physician
Piotr Witczak believes that amalgam can be harmful because he lists it as a source of mercury and links mercury to disorders and diseases.
- Piotr Witczak cites studies indicating a link between having amalgam fillings and multiple sclerosis, and also describes similar reports concerning ALS.
- Piotr Witczak recommends avoiding sources of mercury and removing amalgam fillings, but only with appropriate safeguards.
- The cited reports describe associations and possible risks; they do not prove that every filling causes disease.
What the authors write
Amalgam fillings are listed as one source of mercury in the body.
Andrzej Frydrychowski identifies amalgam fillings as a source of mercury and links long-term exposure to low doses of heavy metals with possible adverse effects.
Piotr Witczak cites publications indicating a link between having amalgam fillings and multiple sclerosis.
Piotr Witczak describes reports of a link between mercury and ALS, but does not present them as proof that amalgam itself causes the disease.
Piotr Witczak gives an example of an anecdotal story about a person whose health allegedly worsened after fillings were removed unsafely and new mercury fillings were placed.
Piotr Witczak recommends removing amalgam fillings safely, using appropriate procedures and safeguards.
Piotr Witczak notes that chronic mercury poisoning can be difficult to identify.
Research from PubMed · Europe PMC
We selected 4 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.
Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 1 482.
The review estimated that the dose of mercury from amalgam is low and that there is little evidence linking fillings to the health problems listed.
Aim of the study: Over the past 150 years, silver-tin-copper amalgam has been the most frequently used dental restorative material. Amalgam may be the single most frequently used implant material.
Results: As expected from the low daily dose, few adverse neurological symptoms have been reported. There is also little evidence of an association of amalgam restorations with neurodegenerative diseases, altered renal function, adverse pregnancy outcomes, or autoimmune diseases. There is a lack of data on neurobiological and neurodevelopmental effects on children who may be exposed to mercury from maternal amalgam restorations during gestation. Additional data on the role of amalgam, if any, in Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis are needed.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
The review concluded that the available evidence does not indicate that amalgam poses a health risk to patients.
Aim of the study: The use of dental amalgam as a restorative material has long been a contentious issue because of its elemental mercury component. While microleakage of mercury from amalgam has been conclusively confirmed over the past 30 years, intensive research has failed to identify deleterious health outcomes.
Results: On current evidence, international consensus heavily supports the statement that amalgam does not constitute a health risk to patients. However, exposure to volatile free mercury in dental clinics should be controlled to eliminate occupational risk. This paper provides a general review of the current situation and issues. It offers a consensus viewpoint for practitioners and lay people in reaching an informed decision on dental amalgam restorations.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
The study found no link between amalgam fillings and Alzheimer's disease or higher levels of mercury in the brain.
Aim of the study: Mercury, or Hg, is a neurotoxin that has been speculated to play a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, or AD. Dental amalgam releases low levels of Hg vapor and is a potential source of Hg for a large segment of the adult population.
Results: The authors found no significant association of AD with the number, surface area or history of having dental amalgam restorations. They also found no statistically significant differences in brain Hg level between subjects with AD and control subjects. Hg in dental amalgam restorations does not appear to be a neurotoxic factor in the pathogenesis of AD. The authors found that brain Hg levels are not associated with dental amalgam, either from existing amalgam restorations or according to subjects' dental amalgam restoration history.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
The risk assessment found that the combined intake of mercury from food and fillings is within the acceptable level.
Aim of the study: Next to nutrition, amalgam fillings represent the main source for exposure of the general population to mercury. Toxicological considerations focus on the dose of mercury resulting from such exposure.
Results: Introducing the dose into the known toxicokinetic model for mercury, tissue and blood and urine concentrations related to mercury release from the fillings can be predicted. These agree well with autopsy and in vivo observations. An assessment of the health hazard for individuals with amalgam fillings shows that the combined mercury intake from food and amalgam does not exceed the acceptable daily intake. In addition, blood and urine mercury concentrations of amalgam bearers are below one tenth of the critical values associated with the onset of early symptoms or of subclinical effects attributable to mercury.
“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.
Perspectives and opinion materials
The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.
Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.