PisaczekSearch
文AEN
Diseases

The microbiome—does immunity really live in the gut?

Sources: 20 · Article: 26 526 characters

Hubert Czerniak says the gut microbiome is meant to program the immune system during childhood.

  • Butyrate produced by gut bacteria is said to support the intestinal lining and immunity.
  • SCFAs are said to link the digestive tract with the immune system, suppress inflammation, and affect the growth of regulatory white blood cells.
  • Czerniak encourages people to support their gut flora with probiotics, prebiotics, fermented foods, and vegetables.

What the authors write

Hubert Czerniak

The microbiome includes various microorganisms living in the human body.

„These are all the “little creatures” (“an ecological community of commensal, symbiotic, and pathogenic microorganisms that share the space of our bodies with us” / Lederman and McCray 2001) found in our internal ecosystem. They include viruses, fungi, bacteria, parasites, and also our own cells, which are 2.5 times fewer in number than this “natural community.””To wszystkie „żyjątka” („ekologiczne skupisko komensalnych, symbiotycznych i patogennych mikroorganizmów, które dzielą z nami przestrzeń naszego organizmu” / Lederman i McCray 2001), które występują w naszym wewnętrznym ekosystemie. Wirusy, grzyby, bakterie, pasożyty, a także nasze komórki, których jest 2,5 razy mniej niż tego „naturalnego towarzystwa”.
Hubert Czerniak

The gut microbiome is meant to program the immune system during childhood, and Hubert Czerniak links disturbances in it to inflammation.

„The microbiome—that is, the flora in a newborn’s gut—programs the immune system during childhood. It is therefore no surprise that failing to provide an immature body with the substances found in colostrum and all the proper bacterial cultures contributes to the development of inflammation.”Mikrobiom bowiem, czyli flora znajdująca się w jelitach noworodka, programuje w dzieciństwie układ odpornościowy. Nic więc dziwnego, że niedostarczenie niedojrzałemu organizmowi substancji zawartych w siarze i wszystkich prawidłowych kultur bakteryjnych jest przyczynkiem do powstawania stanów zapalnych.
Hubert Czerniak

Butyrate produced by gut bacteria is said to support the intestinal lining and the immune system, while tight junctions in the gut are said to limit the passage of unwanted substances.

„Commensal gut bacteria, through fermentation, are said to have a huge effect on the intestinal lining and immune system, specifically through sodium butyrate, which maintains the integrity of the gut, or its cohesion. Tight junctions are responsible for enterocytes fitting closely together so that things we do not need do not “leak” between them.”Komensalne bakterie jelitowe w procesie fermentacji mają olbrzymi wpływ na nabłonek jelit i układ odpornościowy właśnie poprzez maślan sodu, który utrzymuje integralność jelit, czyli spoistość. Tight junction, połączenia ścisłe, odpowiadają za dokładne przyleganie enterocytów do siebie, aby między nimi „nie przeciekało” to, co jest niepotrzebne.
Hubert Czerniak

Hubert Czerniak presents immunity as coming from the gut and links weakened gut immunity to substances entering the body that should have been neutralized.

„It is now officially said that immunity comes from the gut. So if gut immunity is weakened, if the gut becomes leaky, then everything that should naturally be killed and neutralized enters our body, and a whole cascade of diseases begins.”Mówi się już oficjalnie, że odporność bierze się z brzucha. Jeśli więc odporność jelitowa jest osłabiona, jeśli dochodzi do rozszczelnienia jelit, to wszystko to, co naturalnie powinno być zabite i zneutralizowane, wchodzi do naszego organizmu i rozpoczyna się cała lawina — kaskada chorób.
Hubert Czerniak

SCFAs are said to link the immune system with the digestive tract, suppress inflammation, and affect the growth of regulatory white blood cells.

„SCFAs also act as a kind of messenger between the immune system and the digestive tract. They inhibit inflammatory processes through GPR receptors. They suppress inflammatory cytokines and affect the growth of regulatory white blood cells. Mucosal dendritic cells are stimulated through the CD103 receptor to produce the enzyme retinal dehydrogenase in response to fiber intake when vitamin A is present in the diet—this protects against food allergies.”SCFA stanowią także rodzaj komunikatora między układem odpornościowym a przewodem pokarmowym. Hamują procesy zapalne przez receptory GPR. Tłumią cytokiny zapalne i wpływają na wzrost leukocytów regulatorowych. Komórki dendrytyczne błony śluzowej, przez receptor CD103, są pobudzane do produkcji enzymu dehydrogenqazy siatkówkowej w odpowiedzi na karmienie błonnikiem w obecności witaminy A w diecie – chroni to przed alergiami pokarmowymi.
Hubert Czerniak

Hubert Czerniak links differences in gut bacteria between children with diabetes and healthy children to the protective role of certain bacteria.

„Children with diabetes were found to have more Bacteroides and Clostridium bacteria in their gut flora—that is, bacteria that affect the production of the first group of SCFAs. Healthy children, on the other hand, have more Firmicutes, which produce butyrate, as well as Faecalibacterium and Subdoligranulum, and Prevotella and Akkermansia, which affect mucin production. In addition to those mentioned above, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are highly desirable bacteria for our digestive system. They play a protective role against type I diabetes.”U dzieci z cukrzycą zauważono, że ich flora jelitowa ma więcej bakterii Bacteroides i Clostridium, czyli tych wpływających na produkcję pierwszej grupy SCFA. U dzieci zdrowych natomiast występuje więcej Firmicutes, które produkują maślan, a także Faecalibacterium i Subdoligranulum oraz Prevotella i Akkermansia, które wpływają na produkcję mucyny. Oprócz ww., bakteriami bardzo pożądanymi przez nasz układ pokarmowy są Bifidobacterium i Lactobacillus. One odgrywają rolę ochronną przed cukrzyca typu I.
Hubert Czerniak

Hubert Czerniak says sodium butyrate supports immunity and limits inflammation in the gut.

„Sodium butyrate supports the immune system, reduces inflammation in the gut, helps reduce diabetic polyneuropathy, lowers the risk and severity of bowel cancer, and helps with all autoimmune diseases. Why? It all starts in the gut—it is a second brain, where there are more nerve fibers and cells than in the skull.”Maślan sodu wspomaga system odpornościowy, zmniejsza procesy zapalne jelit, wpływa na zmniejszenie polineuropatii cukrzycowych, zmniejsza ryzyko i intensywność raka jelit oraz pomaga nam przy wszelkich chorobach autoagresyjnych. Dlaczego? Wszystko zaczyna się w brzuchu – to drugi mózg, w którym ilość włókien i komórek nerwowych jest większa niż w czaszce.
Tadeusz Trziszka

Tadeusz Trziszka describes prebiotics as substances that stimulate beneficial gut bacteria and may support immune function.

„Studies point to effects from using prebiotics—that is, food components that are not digested but stimulate the growth or activity of beneficial bacteria in our gut, and thus have a beneficial effect on problems related to the digestive tract, neuroprotection, and immune function [26].”Istnieją badania wskazujące na efekty stosowania prebiotyków, tj. składników pożywienia, które nie ulegają trawieniu, ale pobudzają wzrost lub aktywność korzystnych dla organizmu bakterii obecnych w naszych jelitach, a tym samym działają korzystnie na problemy związane z przewodem pokarmowym, neuroprotekcją i funkcjami immunologicznymi [26].
Tadeusz Trziszka

Tadeusz Trziszka says that fiber may increase gut integrity and reduce inflammation, while phospholipids support the intestinal barrier.

„The previously mentioned reduction in the number of butyrate-producing bacteria can be reversed by consuming appropriate amounts of dietary fiber [44]. This intervention may affect the composition of the microbiota, increase gut integrity, and reduce inflammation, perhaps slowing the development of the neurodegenerative process [61].”Wspomniane wcześniej obniżenie liczby bakterii produkujących maślan można odwrócić, spożywając odpowiednie ilości błonnika pokarmowego [44]. Interwencja taka może wpływać na skład mikrobioty, zwiększać szczelność jelit i zmniejszać stan zapalny, wpływając, być może, na spowolnienie rozwoju procesu neurodegeneracyjnego [61].
Tadeusz Trziszka

Tadeusz Trziszka describes gut bacteria as helping, among other things, to neutralize disease-causing bacteria, and the microbiota as communicating with the immune system.

„They include commensal bacteria, whose role is to provide the body with energy, produce metabolites, and neutralize pathogenic bacteria. Some commensal bacteria can produce neuroactive substances that affect brain function.”Wśród nich znajdują się bakterie komensalne, których rolą jest dostarczanie organizmowi energii, produkcja metabolitów, czy unieszkodliwianie bakterii patogennych. Niektóre bakterie komensalne są w stanie wytwarzać substancje neuroaktywne, wpływające na funkcjonowanie mózgu.
Tadeusz Trziszka

Tadeusz Trziszka lists the immune system as one of the pathways through which the microbiota communicates with the brain.

„Communication between the microbiota and the central nervous system takes place mainly through the vagus nerve, the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, the immune system, and metabolites produced by the microbiota. Particularly in recent years, a number of links have been observed between substances produced by bacteria that make up the microbiome and brain function.”Komunikacja mikrobioty z ośrodkowym układem nerwowym zachodzi przede wszystkim za pośrednictwem nerwu błędnego, osi podwzgórze – przysadka – nadnercza, systemu immunologicznego czy produkowanych przez mikrobiotę metabolitów. Szczególnie w ostatnich latach zaobserwowano szereg zależności między substancjami produkowanymi przez bakterie składające się na mikrobiom a funkcjonowaniem mózgu.
Jan Jaśkowski

Jan Jaśkowski describes how a lack of SCFA-producing bacteria may weaken the intestinal lining and increase its permeability.

„These acids are the main fuel for cells in the intestines. They also protect the intestinal lining from damage. If bacteria that produce these acids are lacking, the intestinal lining can become more permeable. This is known as leaky gut syndrome, which allows toxins in the intestines to enter the bloodstream.”Kwasy te są podstawowym paliwem komórek znajdujących się w jelitach. Ponadto chronią one nabłonek jelit przed uszkodzeniem. Jeśli zabraknie bakterii syntetyzujących te kwasy, pojawia się problem z przepuszczalnością nabłonka jelit. Mówimy wówczas o zespole nieszczelnego jelita, który jest przyczyną przedostawania się do krwiobiegu toksyn znajdujących się w jelitach.
Jan Jaśkowski

Jan Jaśkowski links increased gut permeability to toxins entering the blood and causing inflammation in tissues.

„These toxins cause inflammation in various tissues, including blood vessels. One of the most common toxins is lipopolysaccharides (LPS), also called endotoxins. Endotoxins not only cause inflammation in the body but also damage the intestinal lining, making it more permeable.”Toksyny te wywołują stany zapalne różnych tkanek, w tym naczyń krwionośnych. Jedną z najczęściej występujących toksyn są lipopolisacharydy (LPS), zwane także endotoksynami. Endotoksyny nie tylko wywołują stany zapalne organizmu, ale także uszkadzają nabłonek jelit, czyniąc go bardziej przepuszczalnym.
Hubert Czerniak

Hubert Czerniak encourages people to support their gut flora with probiotics, prebiotics, fermented foods, and vegetables.

„Hippocrates himself said that “all disease begins in the gut.” It is worth strengthening the natural gut flora by using probiotics and prebiotics. We should also remember fermented foods and a diet rich in vegetables.”Już sam Hipokrates stwierdził, że „wszystkie choroby zaczynają się w jelitach”. Warto wzmocnić naturalną florę jelitową, stosując probiotyki i prebiotyki. Nie zapominajmy także o kiszonkach oraz diecie bogatej w warzywa.
Tadeusz Trziszka

Tadeusz Trziszka writes that fermented dairy products have a beneficial effect on the gut microbiome, and that milk has a positive effect on immunity.

„Thanks to this unique combination, milk not only supports the body’s structural development but also has a positive effect on digestion, absorption, and immunity. Fermented dairy products have a beneficial effect on the gut microbiome, supporting the prevention of diet-related diseases [14].”Dzięki tej unikatowej kombinacji mleko nie tylko wspiera rozwój strukturalny organizmu, ale też wpływa pozytywnie na procesy trawienia, wchłaniania i odporność. Fermentowane produkty mleczne pozytywnie oddziałują na mikrobiom jelitowy, wspierając profilaktykę chorób dietozależnych [14].
Michał Tombak

Michał Tombak presents the immune system as losing control over parasites as a result of long-term disorders in the body.

„In the body of a person troubled for a long time by toxic emotions—fear, anger, resentment, jealousy, and so on—physical disorders develop, as a result of which the immune system loses control over an army of parasites. They begin to attack the body’s organs, ultimately winning.”W organizmie człowieka targanego przez długi czas toksycznymi emocjami: strachu, gniewu, pretensji, zazdrości itp., dochodzi do zaburzeń somatycznych, w wyniku których układ odpornościowy przestaje panować nad armią pasożytów. Zaczynają one atakować organy ciała, aż do ostatecznego zwycięstwa.

Research from PubMed · Europe PMC

We selected 10 studies with the best, positive results. This is a selection, not a full review of all research.

Total number of studies on this topic in PubMed: 27 367.

The review indicates that dietary components and the gut microbiota influence the host’s immunity in both directions.

Aim of the study: Dietary nutrients and the gut microbiota are increasingly recognized to cross-regulate and entrain each other, and thus affect host health and immune-mediated diseases. Here, we systematically review the current understanding linking dietary nutrients to gut microbiota-host immune interactions, emphasizing how this axis might influence host immunity in health and diseases.

Results: Dietary nutrients and the gut microbiota are increasingly recognized to cross-regulate and entrain each other, and thus affect host health and immune-mediated diseases. Here, we systematically review the current understanding linking dietary nutrients to gut microbiota-host immune interactions, emphasizing how this axis might influence host immunity in health and diseases. Of relevance, we highlight that the implications of gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention could be harnessed in orchestrating a spectrum of immune-associated diseases.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studyreview of many studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The study found that changes in the gut microbiota after BCG vaccination contributed to the development of immune memory in the lungs.

Aim of the study: Aside from centrally induced trained immunity in the bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood by parenteral vaccination or infection, evidence indicates that mucosal-resident innate immune memory can develop via a local inflammatory pathway following mucosal exposure. However, whether mucosal-resident innate memory results from integrating distally generated immunological signals following parenteral vaccination/infection is unclear.

Results: Here we show that subcutaneous Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination can induce memory alveolar macrophages (AMs) and trained immunity in the lung. Although parenteral BCG vaccination trains BM progenitors and circulating monocytes, induction of memory AMs is independent of circulating monocytes. Rather, parenteral BCG vaccination, via mycobacterial dissemination, causes a time-dependent alteration in the intestinal microbiome, barrier function and microbial metabolites, and subsequent changes in circulating and lung metabolites, leading to the induction of memory macrophages and trained immunity in the lung. These data identify an intestinal microbiota-mediated pathway for innate immune memory development at distal mucosal tissues and have implications for the development of next-generation vaccine strategies against respiratory pathogens.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · CIHR, Gouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studyanimal study

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

In the study, a diet containing fermented foods increased microbiota diversity and lowered inflammatory markers, although a high-fiber diet did not change the main immune outcome.

Aim of the study: Diet modulates the gut microbiome, which in turn can impact the immune system. Here, we determined how two microbiota-targeted dietary interventions, plant-based fiber and fermented foods, influence the human microbiome and immune system in healthy adults.

Results: Although cytokine response score (primary outcome) was unchanged, three distinct immunological trajectories in high-fiber consumers corresponded to baseline microbiota diversity. Alternatively, the high-fermented-food diet steadily increased microbiota diversity and decreased inflammatory markers. The data highlight how coupling dietary interventions to deep and longitudinal immune and microbiome profiling can provide individualized and population-wide insight. Fermented foods may be valuable in countering the decreased microbiome diversity and increased inflammation pervasive in industrialized society.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIDDK NIH HHS, National Institutes of Health, NIA NIH HHS
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studystudy with random allocation to groups (RCT)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Antibiotics weakened some vaccine responses in people with low levels of pre-existing antibodies, suggesting that the microbiome may affect immunity.

Aim of the study: Emerging evidence indicates a central role for the microbiome in immunity. However, causal evidence in humans is sparse.

Results: Despite a 10,000-fold reduction in gut bacterial load and long-lasting diminution in bacterial diversity, antibody responses were not significantly affected. However, in a second trial of subjects with low pre-existing antibody titers, there was significant impairment in H1N1-specific neutralization and binding IgG1 and IgA responses. In addition, in both studies antibiotics treatment resulted in (1) enhanced inflammatory signatures (including AP-1/NR4A expression), observed previously in the elderly, and increased dendritic cell activation; (2) divergent metabolic trajectories, with a 1,000-fold reduction in serum secondary bile acids, which was highly correlated with AP-1/NR4A signaling and inflammasome activation. Multi-omics integration revealed significant associations between bacterial species and metabolic phenotypes, highlighting a key role for the microbiome in modulating human immunity.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIAID NIH HHS, National Institutes of Health, NIH HHS
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studystudy with random allocation to groups (RCT)

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review describes how the gut microbiota interacts with local gut immunity and also affects systemic immunity.

Aim of the study: Infectious diseases and infections remain a leading cause of death in low-income countries and a major risk to vulnerable groups, such as infants and the elderly. The immune system plays a crucial role in the susceptibility, persistence, and clearance of these infections.

Results: In addition to the local mucosal immune responses in the gut, it is increasingly recognized that the gut microbiome also affects systemic immunity. Clinicians are more and more using the increased knowledge about these complex interactions between the immune system, the gut microbiome, and human pathogens. The now well-recognized impact of nutrition on the composition of the gut microbiota and the immune system elucidates the role nutrition can play in improving health. This review describes the mechanisms involved in maintaining the intricate balance between the microbiota, gut health, the local immune response, and systemic immunity, linking this to infectious diseases throughout life, and highlights the impact of nutrition in infectious disease prevention and treatment.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?yes — the authors reported it
Did a manufacturer help with the study?YES
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review indicates that the gut microbiota helps shape immune responses and regulate immune balance.

Aim of the study: The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered the largest immunological organ in the body having a central role in regulating immune homeostasis. Contrary to earlier belief, the intestinal epithelial barrier is not a static physical barrier but rather strongly interacts with the gut microbiome and cells of the immune system.

Results: This intense communication between epithelial cells, immune cells and microbiome will shape specific immune responses to antigens, balancing tolerance and effector immune functions. Recent studies indicate that composition of the gut microbiome affects immune system development and modulates immune mediators, which in turn affect the intestinal barrier. Moreover, dysbiosis may favor intestinal barrier disruption and could be related to increased susceptibility to certain diseases. This review will be focused on the development of the intestinal barrier and its function in host immune defense and how gut microbiome composition throughout life can affect this role.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review describes the gut microbiome as a hub for exchanging signals that affect immunity and the body’s response to infections.

Aim of the study: The intestinal microbiome is a signalling hub that integrates environmental inputs, such as diet, with genetic and immune signals to affect the host's metabolism, immunity and response to infection. The haematopoietic and non-haematopoietic cells of the innate immune system are located strategically at the host-microbiome interface.

Results: The intestinal microbiome is a signalling hub that integrates environmental inputs, such as diet, with genetic and immune signals to affect the host's metabolism, immunity and response to infection. The haematopoietic and non-haematopoietic cells of the innate immune system are located strategically at the host-microbiome interface. These cells have the ability to sense microorganisms or their metabolic products and to translate the signals into host physiological responses and the regulation of microbial ecology. Aberrations in the communication between the innate immune system and the gut microbiota might contribute to complex diseases.

Money for the studynot stated
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review indicates that a healthy microbiota supports the maturation of mucosal immunity, while imbalances may lead to immune dysfunction.

Aim of the study: The gut microbiota, the largest symbiotic ecosystem with the host, has been shown to play important roles in maintaining intestinal homeostasis. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome is caused by the imbalance between the commensal and pathogenic microbiomes.

Results: The gut mucosal immune system, which consists of lymph nodes, lamina propria and epithelial cells, constitutes a protective barrier for the integrity of the intestinal tract. The composition of the gut microbiota is under the surveillance of the normal mucosal immune system. Inflammation, which is caused by abnormal immune responses, influences the balance of the gut microbiome, resulting in intestinal diseases. In this review, we briefly outlined the interaction between the gut microbiota and the immune system and provided a reference for future studies.

Money for the studyuniversity or foundation · Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) & Peking Union Medical Collage (PUMC), CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine, Peking Union Medical Collage (PUMC)
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review indicates that the gut microbiota can affect the response to vaccination, including through the effects of its metabolites on immune cells.

Aim of the study: The gut microbiota has emerged as a key modulator of host immune responses, and growing evidence suggests it plays a role in shaping vaccine-induced immunity. While immunization remains vital for preventing infectious diseases, inter-individual variability in vaccine responses poses a persistent challenge.

Results: Factors that alter microbiota composition, including antibiotics, diet, and prebiotic or probiotic supplementation, can impact vaccine responses, highlighting a dynamic gut-immune relationship. Experimental models further support these observations, showing diminished responses in germ-free or antibiotic-treated animals and enhanced responses following microbial-based interventions. These findings also suggest the gut microbiota may be harnessed to improve vaccine efficacy. Future research should explore the potential for microbiota-targeted strategies to optimize vaccine efficacy, particularly in immunocompromised populations.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · Medical Research Council
Do the authors have ties to companies?no — the authors say so
Did a manufacturer help with the study?NO
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

The review indicates that the gut microbiota affects adaptive immune responses and may be important in the course of malaria.

Aim of the study: Malaria continues to pose a severe threat to over half of the world's population each year. With no long-term, effective vaccine available and a growing resistance to antimalarials, there is a need for innovative methods of Plasmodium treatment.

Results: With no long-term, effective vaccine available and a growing resistance to antimalarials, there is a need for innovative methods of Plasmodium treatment. Recent evidence has pointed to a role of the composition of the gut microbiota in the severity of Plasmodium infection in both animal models and human studies. Further evidence has shown that the gut microbiota influences the adaptive immune response of the host, the arm of the immune system necessary for Plasmodium clearance, sustained Plasmodium immunity, and vaccine efficacy. Together, this illustrates the future potential of gut microbiota modulation as a novel method of preventing severe malaria.

Money for the studygovernment, public institutions · NIAID NIH HHS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Do the authors have ties to companies?not stated
Did a manufacturer help with the study?unknown
Type of studydiscussion of other studies

“Not stated” does not mean nobody paid — the database does not always record it.

Perspectives and opinion materials

The content below presents the authors’ opinions, interpretations and hypotheses. It is not treated as equal to scientific studies and systematic reviews.

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Summary By employing the natural balance of raw milk and fermented raw milk throughout the farm, along with rotational grazing, we create a positive feedback loop, a microbiome tuning, that plays out over multiple seasons resulting in a microbiome balance in the "immune system of the farm" that reduces or eliminates disease conditions. Banning any chemicals from the farm that disrupt the microbiome tuning process ensures that the tuning process moves forward to optimize human and animal health and toward the elimination of disease conditions on the farm.”Summary By employing the natural balance of raw milk and fermented raw milk throughout the farm, along with rotational grazing, we create a positive feedback loop, a microbiome tuning, that plays out over multiple seasons resulting in a microbiome balance in the "immune system of the farm" that reduces or eliminates disease conditions. Banning any chemicals from the farm that disrupt the microbiome tuning process ensures that the tuning process moves forward to optimize human and animal health and toward the elimination of disease conditions on the farm.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„Lezutekong J, Nikhanj A, Oudit G (2018) Imbalance of gut microbiome and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Clinical Science 132:901-904. PMID: 29712884 5. Obrenovich MEM (2018) Leaky gut, leaky brain? Microorganisms 6. PMID: 30340384 6. Belkaid Y, Harrison O (2017) Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 46:562-576. PMID: 28423337 7. Mendoza L (2019) Potential effect of probiotics in the treatment of breast cancer. Oncology Reviews 13:422. PMID: 31583054 8. Pushalkar S, Hundeyin M, Daley D et al.”Lezutekong J, Nikhanj A, Oudit G (2018) Imbalance of gut microbiome and intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Clinical Science 132:901-904. PMID: 29712884 5. Obrenovich MEM (2018) Leaky gut, leaky brain? Microorganisms 6. PMID: 30340384 6. Belkaid Y, Harrison O (2017) Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity 46:562-576. PMID: 28423337 7. Mendoza L (2019) Potential effect of probiotics in the treatment of breast cancer. Oncology Reviews 13:422. PMID: 31583054 8. Pushalkar S, Hundeyin M, Daley D et al.
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service Opinion material
„[17] The important relationship between the microbiome and the brain is referred to as the "enteric nervous system" or the "gut-brain axis". They are major essential components of every cell membrane, including brain cells and the cells lining blood vessels. Lipids also serve as cell signaling molecules regulating a wide variety of functions impacting all tissues in the body. A diet devoid of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids is as fatal as a diet devoid of niacin or any other vitamin.”[17] The important relationship between the microbiome and the brain is referred to as the "enteric nervous system" or the "gut-brain axis". They are major essential components of every cell membrane, including brain cells and the cells lining blood vessels. Lipids also serve as cell signaling molecules regulating a wide variety of functions impacting all tissues in the body. A diet devoid of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids is as fatal as a diet devoid of niacin or any other vitamin.

Pisaczek does not judge who is right. It shows what was written and where to read it. Every sentence above has its source.